Close Menu
    Facebook Instagram LinkedIn
    • العربية (Arabic)
    • English
    • Français (French)
    Facebook Instagram LinkedIn
    Middle East Transparent
    • Home
    • Categories
      1. Headlines
      2. Features
      3. Commentary
      4. Magazine
      5. Cash economy
      Featured
      Headlines Ronald Sandee

      New Front to be Opened in Kurdish areas of Iran

      Recent
      4 March 2026

      New Front to be Opened in Kurdish areas of Iran

      3 March 2026

      A return to the same process, or a new modality?

      2 March 2026

      The Death of Khamenei and the End of an Era

    • Contact us
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • العربية (Arabic)
    • English
    • Français (French)
    Middle East Transparent
    You are at:Home»Categories»Headlines»If we accept the common narratives about Ashura, Karbala, and Hussein!

    If we accept the common narratives about Ashura, Karbala, and Hussein!

    1
    By Hussein Al-Wadi‘i on 12 January 2026 Headlines

     

     

    Shaffaf had published the Arabic version of this article, by Yemeni writer Hussein Al-Wadi‘i,
    on November 22, 2025. Today, we had the nice surprise of receiving the following translation from a Muslim friend who requested not to diclose his name. May this encourage other readers to do the same! 

    *

     

    If we accept the common narratives about Ashura, Karbala, and Hussein!

    If we accept these narratives, then by Islamic legal standards—Sunni and Shia—Hussein was a man who rebelled against the ruler.

     

     

    In classical Islamic law, rebelling against a ruler, even an unjust one, is punishable by death. So he received what the law prescribed.

    By political standards, he was an aging and naïve man.

    He failed to read power realities.

    He believed emotions and loyalty were enough to seize power from an empire whose forces stretched across three continents.

    By human standards, he had a narrow outlook.

    He believed power was a hereditary right of one family because of its kinship to the Prophet.

    His view of authority was priestly and sanctified rulers.

    From a religious perspective, he was not especially pious, ascetic, or devout.

    Like his father, his brother, and many senior companions, he married often, loved wealth and status, lived comfortably from public funds, and treated Muslim blood lightly in pursuit of power.

    If history is read objectively and rationally, there is no real difference between Hussein and Yazid.

    Hussein was neither an angel nor a devil.

    He was an ordinary man, shaped by his environment, its simplicity, and its ambitions.

    Even the idealized image—if we accept it—does not meet today’s standards of virtue.

    Any primary-school child today has more knowledge and moral awareness than Hussein’s basic, narcissistic belief in inherited rule.

    The romantic image was created by literature, even by prominent Arab leftists and Marxists.

    Ashura and Karbala were no more than a minor incident.

    Ideological and political propaganda turned it into a river of blood and chaos.

     

     

    Arabic Source:

    حسين الوادعي:  لو صدّقنا المَرويات حول عاشوراء وكربلاء والحسين

     

    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email WhatsApp Copy Link
    Previous ArticleEurope Must Stop Practicing “Competitive Détente” in the Arctic
    Next Article Saida and the Politics of a Surplus City
    Subscribe
    Notify of
    guest
    guest
    1 Comment
    Newest
    Oldest Most Voted
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    MEMEMEM
    MEMEMEM
    1 month ago

    It’s a great piece. The author made a complex topic easy to understand.

    0
    Reply
    RSS Recent post in french
    • Le Liban entre la logique de l’État et le suicide iranien 3 March 2026 Dr. Fadil Hammoud
    • Réunion tendue du cabinet : différend entre le Premier ministre et le chef d’état-major des armées, qui a menacé de démissionner ! 3 March 2026 Shaffaf Exclusive
    • En Arabie saoudite, le retour au réalisme de « MBS », contraint d’en rabattre sur ses projets pharaoniques 27 February 2026 Hélène Sallon
    • À Benghazi, quinze ans après, les espoirs déçus de la révolution libyenne 18 February 2026 Maryline Dumas
    • Dans le nord de la Syrie, le barrage de Tichrine, la forteresse qui a résisté aux remous de la guerre civile 17 February 2026 Hélène Sallon
    RSS Recent post in arabic
    • الشيعة والنضال ضد الظلم*: الاختلاف الحادّ حول “ولاية الفقيه” بين المرشد وابنه مجتبى! 3 March 2026 مجتبى خامنئي
    • جلسة حكومية متوترة: خلاف بين رئيس الحكومة وقائد الجيش الذي هدد بالإستقالة! 3 March 2026 خاص بالشفاف
    • إزاحة الغموض عن مشهد الحرب والسلام في سوريا 2 March 2026 أندرو جي تابلر
    • عندما يغرق قارب طهران، هل سيغرق لبنان أم سَيَنجو؟ 1 March 2026 سمارة القزّي
    • أعرافي.. هل هو المرشد الإيراني القادم؟ 1 March 2026 شفاف- خاص
    26 February 2011

    Metransparent Preliminary Black List of Qaddafi’s Financial Aides Outside Libya

    6 December 2008

    Interview with Prof Hafiz Mohammad Saeed

    7 July 2009

    The messy state of the Hindu temples in Pakistan

    27 July 2009

    Sayed Mahmoud El Qemany Apeal to the World Conscience

    8 March 2022

    Russian Orthodox priests call for immediate end to war in Ukraine

    Recent Comments
    • Kamal Richa on When Tehran’s Anchor Falls, Will Lebanon Sink or Swim?
    • me Me on The Disturbing Question at the Heart of the Trump-Zelensky Drama
    • me Me on The Disturbing Question at the Heart of the Trump-Zelensky Drama
    • کمیسیون پارلمان ترکیه قانون موقتی را برای روند خلع سلاح پ ک ک پیشنهاد کرد - MORSHEDI on Turkish parliamentary commission proposes temporary law for PKK disarmament process
    • سیاست آمریکا در قبال لبنان: موانعی برای از بین بردن قدرت حزب الله - MORSHEDI on U.S. Policy Toward Lebanon: Obstacles to Dismantling Hezbollah’s Grip on Power
    Donate
    © 2026 Middle East Transparent

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    wpDiscuz