Close Menu
    Facebook Instagram LinkedIn
    • العربية (Arabic)
    • English
    • Français (French)
    Facebook Instagram LinkedIn
    Middle East Transparent
    • Home
    • Categories
      1. Headlines
      2. Features
      3. Commentary
      4. Magazine
      5. Cash economy
      Featured
      Headlines Ronald Sandee

      Did Iran just activate Operation Judgement Day?

      Recent
      8 March 2026

      Did Iran just activate Operation Judgement Day?

      5 March 2026

      Another Lebanon Campaign: A Path Toward Peace?

      4 March 2026

      New Front to be Opened in Kurdish areas of Iran

    • Contact us
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • العربية (Arabic)
    • English
    • Français (French)
    Middle East Transparent
    You are at:Home»Categories»Commentary»The Death of Khamenei and the End of an Era

    The Death of Khamenei and the End of an Era

    0
    By karim Sadjadpour on 2 March 2026 Commentary

    His life’s work was to preserve a revolution that is heading for the ash heap.

    “The essence of oligarchical rule,” George Orwell wrote in 1984, “is the persistence of a certain world-view and a certain way of life, imposed by the dead upon the living.” For nearly four decades, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei presided over exactly that. He did not build the Islamic Republic of Iran. He inherited it from its founder, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, who in 1979 led a revolution that deposed a U.S.-aligned monarchy and replaced it with an Islamist theocracy whose three ideological pillars were “Death to America,” “Death to Israel,” and the mandatory covering of  women—the hijab, he said, was “the flag of the revolution.”

     

    Khomeini died in 1989, and his successor’s life’s work was to keep that revolution alive long after the society it governed had moved on. In this, Khamenei was remarkably, ruthlessly successful. But the worldview he imposed was never truly his own. He was the spokesman for a ghost.

    Khamenei’s death by the hand of a nation he worked very hard to kill is a hinge moment in the history of the 47-year-old revolution. He was the last of the regime’s first-generation founders.

    Read: The epic miscalculations of Trump and Khamenei

    Khamenei’s rise was engineered not by destiny but by maneuver. In 1989, Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, the shrewd speaker of Parliament and the son of a pistachio merchant, helped anoint Khamenei as supreme leader by claiming that it was Khomeini’s dying wish. Rafsanjani likely believed that he was working to install a pliant figurehead. Khamenei—the son of a poor cleric from the shrine city of Mashhad—had other ideas.

    The rivalry between them endured for three decades. Rafsanjani favored wealth creation and détente with the United States; Khamenei believed that compromising on revolutionary principles would hasten the regime’s collapse, just as perestroika had undone the Soviet Union. As Machiavelli warned, “He who is the cause of another becoming powerful is ruined.”

    Khamenei’s lack of clerical legitimacy, and his general insecurity, led him to cultivate the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps as his praetorian force; he handpicked commanders and rotated them to prevent rivals from accumulating power. The IRGC eclipsed the clergy as Iran’s most powerful institution—politically expedient for Khamenei and financially expedient for the Guards, which became the dominant economic force in the theocracy it defended. Khamenei wielded Iran’s elected institutions as facades, allowing just enough political theater to project legitimacy. No matter what agenda the president espoused—the economic pragmatism of Rafsanjani, the liberal aspirations of Mohammad Khatami, the populist provocations of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the nuclear diplomacy of Hassan Rouhani—Khamenei emasculated him.

    An Iranian academic, some of whose students rose to senior government positions in Tehran, once told me that at the revolution’s beginning, the regime consisted of “80 percent indoctrinated believers—largely ignorant of global realities—and 20 percent charlatans and chameleons.” By Khamenei’s final years, he said, the ratio had inverted: 20 percent believers, 80 percent opportunists who flocked around officials for wealth and privilege.

    Khamenei’s anti-Americanism was cloaked in ideology but also driven by self-preservation. The powerful cleric Ahmad Jannati once articulated the regime’s deepest anxiety: “If pro-American tendencies come to power in Iran, we have to say goodbye to everything.” Khamenei shared this conviction absolutely. “Reconciliation between Iran and America is possible,” he once said, in a revealing formulation, “but it is not possible between the Islamic Republic and America.” The American philosopher Eric Hoffer captured this logic in his 1951 book on mass movements, The True Believer. “Hatred is the most accessible and comprehensive of all unifying agents,” he wrote; mass movements “can rise and spread without belief in a god, but never without belief in a devil.” America was Khamenei’s devil.

    Khamenei understood that his power was best preserved in a bubble. Not complete isolation—he wanted to sell Iran’s oil—but calibrated insularity, walled off from the global forces of capitalism and civil society that would expose and erode the regime. He had translated the works of the radical anti-Western Egyptian thinker Sayyid Qutb into Persian during his years in the shah’s prisons; decades later, he remained in the same intellectual bunker, convinced that Western culture posed a greater threat than Western bombs.

    But insularity has its costs, and they were borne entirely by the Iranian people. Khamenei treated the relationship between the state and its citizens not as a social contract but as a predatory lease—nonnegotiable, imposed by the landlord, long since expired. The regime micromanaged the personal lives of more than 90 million people, dictating whom they were allowed to love, what they drank, what women wore on their heads. It preached austerity while the Guards operated as a tax-exempt conglomerate. It built a digital wall around the country, blocking global platforms while regime officials posted propaganda on X. It charged protesters with “waging war against God” and maintained the world’s highest execution rate per capita. When even that was not enough to quell dissent—last month, as protests again swept the country—Khamenei ordered what may prove to be one of the deadliest episodes of state violence in modern history.

    Khamenei confronted the paradox that every revolutionary caretaker must face: The revolution he preserved was designed for a world that no longer exists. George Kennan once wrote of the Soviet Union, “No mystical, Messianic movement can face frustration indefinitely without eventually adjusting itself in one way or another to the logic of that state of affairs.” Khamenei staved off that adjustment for nearly four decades through force of will, brutality, and the conviction that bending would mean breaking.

    In the end, he was felled by Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu, an American president and an Israeli prime minister whom he loathed. He lived by “Death to America” and “Death to Israel.” He died by death from America and Israel.

    THE ATLANTIC
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email WhatsApp Copy Link
    Previous ArticleWhen Tehran’s Anchor Falls, Will Lebanon Sink or Swim?
    Next Article A return to the same process, or a new modality?
    Subscribe
    Notify of
    guest
    guest
    0 Comments
    Newest
    Oldest Most Voted
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    RSS Recent post in french
    • Le Liban entre la logique de l’État et le suicide iranien 3 March 2026 Dr. Fadil Hammoud
    • Réunion tendue du cabinet : différend entre le Premier ministre et le chef d’état-major des armées, qui a menacé de démissionner ! 3 March 2026 Shaffaf Exclusive
    • En Arabie saoudite, le retour au réalisme de « MBS », contraint d’en rabattre sur ses projets pharaoniques 27 February 2026 Hélène Sallon
    • À Benghazi, quinze ans après, les espoirs déçus de la révolution libyenne 18 February 2026 Maryline Dumas
    • Dans le nord de la Syrie, le barrage de Tichrine, la forteresse qui a résisté aux remous de la guerre civile 17 February 2026 Hélène Sallon
    RSS Recent post in arabic
    • الشيعة والنضال ضد الظلم*: الاختلاف الحادّ حول “ولاية الفقيه” بين المرشد وابنه مجتبى! 8 March 2026 مجتبى خامنئي
    • هل قام الحرس بـ”عَزل” الرئيس بزشكيان بعد “اعتذاره” عن قصف دول الخليج وتعهّده بوقف القصف؟ 7 March 2026 خاص بالشفاف
    • “الواقعية المتوحشة”: انتحار الأنظمة وموت الدولة الوطنية 6 March 2026 أبو القاسم المشاي
    • في بنغلاديش.. الدبمقراطية تعيد انتاج الماضي 6 March 2026 د. عبدالله المدني
    • الحرب الجديدة في لبنان: هل تمهّد لمسار نحو السلام؟ 5 March 2026 أساف أوريون
    26 February 2011

    Metransparent Preliminary Black List of Qaddafi’s Financial Aides Outside Libya

    6 December 2008

    Interview with Prof Hafiz Mohammad Saeed

    7 July 2009

    The messy state of the Hindu temples in Pakistan

    27 July 2009

    Sayed Mahmoud El Qemany Apeal to the World Conscience

    8 March 2022

    Russian Orthodox priests call for immediate end to war in Ukraine

    Recent Comments
    • بيار عقل on Did Iran just activate Operation Judgement Day?
    • Kamal Richa on When Tehran’s Anchor Falls, Will Lebanon Sink or Swim?
    • me Me on The Disturbing Question at the Heart of the Trump-Zelensky Drama
    • me Me on The Disturbing Question at the Heart of the Trump-Zelensky Drama
    • کمیسیون پارلمان ترکیه قانون موقتی را برای روند خلع سلاح پ ک ک پیشنهاد کرد - MORSHEDI on Turkish parliamentary commission proposes temporary law for PKK disarmament process
    Donate
    © 2026 Middle East Transparent

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    wpDiscuz