Close Menu
    Facebook Instagram LinkedIn
    • العربية (Arabic)
    • English
    • Français (French)
    Facebook Instagram LinkedIn
    Middle East Transparent
    • Home
    • Categories
      1. Headlines
      2. Features
      3. Commentary
      4. Magazine
      5. Cash economy
      Featured
      Headlines Samara Azzi

      When Tehran’s Anchor Falls, Will Lebanon Sink or Swim?

      Recent
      3 March 2026

      A return to the same process, or a new modality?

      2 March 2026

      The Death of Khamenei and the End of an Era

      1 March 2026

      When Tehran’s Anchor Falls, Will Lebanon Sink or Swim?

    • Contact us
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • العربية (Arabic)
    • English
    • Français (French)
    Middle East Transparent
    You are at:Home»Categories»Headlines»Asia Strategic report: Was the Karachi incident due to leakage during nuclear fuel transportation

    Asia Strategic report: Was the Karachi incident due to leakage during nuclear fuel transportation

    0
    By Shaffaf Exclusive on 8 April 2020 Headlines

    The international media is so focused on the corona virus epidemic that is spreading rapidly across the world, that a small incident in the Pakistani port city of Karachi went almost unnoticed. The incident took place near the port area in Karachi on the night of February 16, where it was reported that due to a gas leak at least 14 people were killed and several hundred hospitalised with chest pains, burning eyes and breathing difficulties. The Sindh government, thereafter, also ordered the evacuation of the coastal residential area of Keamari, which was worst affected.

     

    • lt has been three weeks since the incident, but the local provincial government in Sindh has failed to explain the reason for the incident. Varied possibilities and conflicting explanations have emerged from within the government agencies. The administrativein­ charge of Karachi city, Commissioner lftikhar Shallwani, stated that the probable cause of the toxic gas could have been due to the spread of soybean dust or similar substance during the offloading of a container from a ship. Meanwhile, an initial investigation in the incident by the Sindh Environmental Protection Agency showed that the incident had been caused by hydrogen sulphide emissions from the terminal storing crude oil and petroleum. This report was later contested by the Sindh Chemical Science Laboratory who were of the opinion that the leak was caused by the release of methyl bromide, used in the fumigation of large vessels at the port. Days later, the Karachi Port Trust issued a press statement informing that after checking of all terminais and berths, it was confirmed that there was no gas or chemical leakage at the port.
    Mystery gas leaks sweep Karachi
    • So what actually caused death and injury to the hundreds of citizens of this Pakistani city and why has the Pakistani government failed to speak in one voice on this. On February 25, the police claimed to have arrested those involved in the gas leak. No names of the suspected perpetrators were released.
    • Significantly, some observers have pointed out that Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission (PAEC) and China Nuclear Energy lndustry Corporation (CNEIC) have been in the process of transporting nuclear fuel assemblies for the Karachi Nuclear Power Plant. While the CNEIC would be responsible for fuel transportation from Shanghai to Karachi port, PAEC would be in-charge of further movement of the fuel to the nuclear power plant site. The PAEC would be using Karachi Port for the delivery of the nuclear fuel assemblies. The Karachi Nuclear Plant is located 10 kms away from the Keamari area and therefore, it has been suspected that the toxic leak may have taken place due to a leakage during the nuclear fuel transportation.
    • Earlier, 5 Pakistani businessmen were indicted (Jan 2020) in the US for operating an international network of front companies to export US-origin products to Pakistan for use in that country’s nuclear program. The five were accused of operating a front company called ‘Business World’ in Rawalpindi, Pakistan and charged with conspiring to violate the International Emergency Economie Powers Act and the Export Control Reform Act. US Assistant Attorney General for the National Security Division John Demers informed that ‘The defendants smuggled US origin goods to entities that have been designated for years as threats to US national security for their ties to Pakistan’s weapons programmes’. The men transported the goods to Pakistan’s Advanced Engineering Research Organization (AERO) and the PAEC without export licenses, according to the indictment. lt identified 38 illegal nuclear-related experts from 29 U.S. companies to Pakistan between September 2014 and October 2019.
    • The two Pakistani entities – AERO and PAEC – are on the US Commerce Department’s list of companies required to hold export licenses because their activities are deemed contrary to U.S. national security or foreign policy interests. PAEC was added to the list in 1998 after Pakistan carried out a series of underground nuclear tests in response to lndian nuclear tests. AERO was included in 2014 after the US found that it had used intermediaries and front companies to acquire goods for Pakistan’s cruise missile and strategic unmanned aerial vehicle programs, the Justice Department said.
    • These developments underscore the dangers of mismanagement of nuclear technology in Pakistan.
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email WhatsApp Copy Link
    Previous Articleفايروسات منصات التواصل الاجتماعي
    Next Article Covid-19… Now for the Really Bad News
    Subscribe
    Notify of
    guest
    guest
    0 Comments
    Newest
    Oldest Most Voted
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    RSS Recent post in french
    • Le Liban entre la logique de l’État et le suicide iranien 3 March 2026 Dr. Fadil Hammoud
    • Réunion tendue du cabinet : différend entre le Premier ministre et le chef d’état-major des armées, qui a menacé de démissionner ! 3 March 2026 Shaffaf Exclusive
    • En Arabie saoudite, le retour au réalisme de « MBS », contraint d’en rabattre sur ses projets pharaoniques 27 February 2026 Hélène Sallon
    • À Benghazi, quinze ans après, les espoirs déçus de la révolution libyenne 18 February 2026 Maryline Dumas
    • Dans le nord de la Syrie, le barrage de Tichrine, la forteresse qui a résisté aux remous de la guerre civile 17 February 2026 Hélène Sallon
    RSS Recent post in arabic
    • الشيعة والنضال ضد الظلم*: الاختلاف الحادّ حول “ولاية الفقيه” بين المرشد وابنه مجتبى! 3 March 2026 مجتبى خامنئي
    • جلسة حكومية متوترة: خلاف بين رئيس الحكومة وقائد الجيش الذي هدد بالإستقالة! 3 March 2026 خاص بالشفاف
    • إزاحة الغموض عن مشهد الحرب والسلام في سوريا 2 March 2026 أندرو جي تابلر
    • عندما يغرق قارب طهران، هل سيغرق لبنان أم سَيَنجو؟ 1 March 2026 سمارة القزّي
    • أعرافي.. هل هو المرشد الإيراني القادم؟ 1 March 2026 شفاف- خاص
    26 February 2011

    Metransparent Preliminary Black List of Qaddafi’s Financial Aides Outside Libya

    6 December 2008

    Interview with Prof Hafiz Mohammad Saeed

    7 July 2009

    The messy state of the Hindu temples in Pakistan

    27 July 2009

    Sayed Mahmoud El Qemany Apeal to the World Conscience

    8 March 2022

    Russian Orthodox priests call for immediate end to war in Ukraine

    Recent Comments
    • Kamal Richa on When Tehran’s Anchor Falls, Will Lebanon Sink or Swim?
    • me Me on The Disturbing Question at the Heart of the Trump-Zelensky Drama
    • me Me on The Disturbing Question at the Heart of the Trump-Zelensky Drama
    • کمیسیون پارلمان ترکیه قانون موقتی را برای روند خلع سلاح پ ک ک پیشنهاد کرد - MORSHEDI on Turkish parliamentary commission proposes temporary law for PKK disarmament process
    • سیاست آمریکا در قبال لبنان: موانعی برای از بین بردن قدرت حزب الله - MORSHEDI on U.S. Policy Toward Lebanon: Obstacles to Dismantling Hezbollah’s Grip on Power
    Donate
    © 2026 Middle East Transparent

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    wpDiscuz