Close Menu
    Facebook Instagram LinkedIn
    • العربية (Arabic)
    • English
    • Français (French)
    Facebook Instagram LinkedIn
    Middle East Transparent
    • Home
    • Categories
      1. Headlines
      2. Features
      3. Commentary
      4. Magazine
      5. Cash economy
      Featured
      Headlines Khalil Youssef Beidas

      The Panic Seeps to Dodge City

      Recent
      25 January 2026

      Federalism Is the Only Shield Lebanon and Iraq Have Left in a Nuclearizing Middle East

      25 January 2026

      The Panic Seeps to Dodge City

      23 January 2026

      Inside the Bank Audi Play: How Public Money Became Private Profit

    • Contact us
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • العربية (Arabic)
    • English
    • Français (French)
    Middle East Transparent
    You are at:Home»Categories»Features»Israel sets to annex disputed maritime border area

    Israel sets to annex disputed maritime border area

    0
    By Ynet on 20 March 2017 Features
    The dispute between Israel and Lebanon over the maritime border between them has been going on for years, with both countries claiming a specific area as part of their territory; Now, Israel plans to propose a bill that includes the aforementioned area as part of its own territory—and as such, under its sovereignty.

    Amir Ben-David|

    It was recently decided to bring a bill to define the maritime economic border with Lebanon to be read and voted on by the government and the Knesset. The move comes after years of delaying the ruling on Israel’s maritime border, partially due to efforts by the United States and the United Nations to mediate between Israel and Lebanon.

     

     

    The proposed bill includes a large territory still under dispute with Lebanon.

    Israel-Lebanon maritime border

    Israel-Lebanon maritime border

     

    The bill is aimed to claim Israel’s sovereignty over the area, mainly for the purpose of harvesting natural recourses like oil and gas.

    According to international law, dividing territory between states that reside near the same maritime area is done through their mutual agreement and is largely based on the “mid-point” between the two.

    Though Israel and Lebanon have been in dispute over what the mid-point between their maritime borders is, both countries are fighting over an 800 square kilometer trianglular maritime area (seen in the picture as areas 1-3), with both claiming they have the right to extract oil and gas from the area.

    After Lebanon recently broke the status quo, advertising a tender to search for natural resources in the disputed area, Israel began promoting a bill that aims to define the area within the Israel’s maritime territory.

    Minister of Environmental Protection Ze’ev Elkin and Minister of National Infrastructure, Energy and Water Resources Yuval Steinitz (Likud) consolidated other agreements regarding what government body would have the authority over the area, eventually giving it to the Ministry of Energy. The Ministery of Environmental Protection agreed to stay as a non-authority advisory agency.

    The Ministry of Environmental Protection responded that “the bill has many positive aspects regarding the environment, as it promises certainty of the application of environmental laws in the area. However, the ministry is not satisfied with the current arrangement which does not clarify what agency will be the one overseeing the impact on the environment.”

    YNET
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email WhatsApp Copy Link
    Previous ArticleSyria claims it shot down an Israeli combat plane; Israel denies: dissecting the latest IAF strike on Damascu
    Next Article Six Years of War: Is Assad Still Relevant?
    Subscribe
    Notify of
    guest
    guest
    0 Comments
    Newest
    Oldest Most Voted
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    RSS Recent post in french
    • Au Liban, des transactions immobilières de l’OLP suscitent des questions 18 January 2026 L'Orient Le Jour
    • Pourquoi la pomme de la tyrannie tombe-t-elle toujours ? 10 January 2026 Walid Sinno
    • La liberté comme dette — et comme devoir trahi par les gouvernants 2 January 2026 Walid Sinno
    • La « Gap Law »: pourquoi la précipitation, et pourquoi les Français ? 30 December 2025 Pierre-Étienne Renaudin
    • Au Liban, une réforme cruciale pour sortir enfin de la crise 23 December 2025 Sibylle Rizk
    RSS Recent post in arabic
    • لِشهرين أم لِسنتين: الانتخابات النيابية مؤجّلة حُكماً! 25 January 2026 كمال ريشا
    • ثرثرة على ضفة الحركة (2): “الفلسطينيّة” و”العربيّة” 25 January 2026 هشام دبسي
    • الهَلَع يتسرَّب إلى دودج سيتي 25 January 2026 خليل يوسف بيدس
    • قضية “بنك عودة”: كيف تحوّلت الأموال العامة إلى أرباح خاصة 24 January 2026 سمارة القزّي
    • حوارٌ ضروري حول قبرص، والأمن، ونصف القصة الغائب 24 January 2026 يوسف كانلي
    26 February 2011

    Metransparent Preliminary Black List of Qaddafi’s Financial Aides Outside Libya

    6 December 2008

    Interview with Prof Hafiz Mohammad Saeed

    7 July 2009

    The messy state of the Hindu temples in Pakistan

    27 July 2009

    Sayed Mahmoud El Qemany Apeal to the World Conscience

    8 March 2022

    Russian Orthodox priests call for immediate end to war in Ukraine

    Recent Comments
    • Nadim Shehadi on The Panic Seeps to Dodge City
    • Yusuf Kanli on A necessary conversation: On Cyprus, security, and the missing half of the story
    • Mohamed on Inside the Bank Audi Play: How Public Money Became Private Profit
    • JudgmentalOne on A necessary conversation: On Cyprus, security, and the missing half of the story
    • Drivers Behind Audi’s Top-Level Management Shake-Up - Middle East Transparent on Lebanon’s banks are running out of excuses
    Donate
    © 2026 Middle East Transparent

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    wpDiscuz