Close Menu
    Facebook Instagram LinkedIn
    • العربية (Arabic)
    • English
    • Français (French)
    Facebook Instagram LinkedIn
    Middle East Transparent
    • Home
    • Categories
      1. Headlines
      2. Features
      3. Commentary
      4. Magazine
      5. Cash economy
      Featured
      Headlines Samara Azzi

      Liquidity at the Core of Lebanon’s Financial Deposit Repayment Act

      Recent
      9 January 2026

      Liquidity at the Core of Lebanon’s Financial Deposit Repayment Act

      6 January 2026

      Talk and Plot: Teheran Double Game with the Sharaa Regime

      5 January 2026

      When “law enforcement” looks like piracy: The Maduro seizure, Türkiye’s caution, and the “precedent” problem

    • Contact us
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • العربية (Arabic)
    • English
    • Français (French)
    Middle East Transparent
    You are at:Home»Proposed divorce laws trigger controversy in Pakistan‏

    Proposed divorce laws trigger controversy in Pakistan‏

    0
    By Sarah Akel on 22 November 2008 Uncategorized

    LAHORE: Pakistan’s top Islamic advisory body’s recent recommendation to the federal government to drastically amend the outdated divorce laws and give more say to women in divorce cases has triggered a serious controversy, with Islamic hardliners vowing to resist the proposed amendments with full might.

    The Council of Islamic Ideology had (CII) proposed to the PPP government last week after thorough deliberations that a divorce should go into effect within three months of a woman’s request and it should be mandatory for a husband to divorce his wife within 90 days if she submits a written demand for divorce. If the husband fails to do so, the recommendations say, the marriage would automatically stand cancelled after the 90-day term lapsed, except if the wife withdrew her demand. The recommendations say if the husband gave his wife assets and property and demanded them back at the time of divorce, the wife would have to return the assets except for dower and maintenance or else approach a court of law for the resolution of the conflict.

    Under existing Pakistani laws, men are free to divorce their wives, but a woman can only start divorce proceedings if she first surrenders her right to ‘mehr’, or money pledged to her at the time of wedding as a token of her husband’s earnestness. Existing laws allow a husband to divorce his wife verbally in private but the CII recommended it should be done in writing. Though this proposal was received well by the progressive sections of the Pakistani society, there was a lot of hue and cry raised by the religious circles. Many religious scholars strongly objected to the CII recommendations which have already been forwarded to the federal government to ensure their implementation through the parliament that is actually empowered to amend laws.

    Hardliners, however, have branded the proposed changes by the CII un-Islamic and at odds with Islamic shariah. “The so-called Council of Islamic Ideology is trying to invent a new Islamic Shariah,” said Mufti Munibur Rehman, a leading Pakistani cleric who signed a statement with other hardliners criticising the CII. “They are trying to create anarchy and chaos in the country and if they are not stopped then I fear a movement for enforcement of true Islamic shariah would be launched throughout the country.” “The Council of Islamic Ideology is crossing its constitutional limits by recommending un-Islamic reforms in the law,” said Hanif Jalandhry, the secretary general of the Alliance of Organisations of Islamic Schools.

    As the issue was taken up on the floor of the National Assembly the other day by hardline clerics, demanding the sacking the chairman of the Council for Islamic Ideology for his un-Islamic recommendations to change the divorce law, the PPP government strangely decided to disown the recommendations and announced sending them back to the CII for review. Minister for Parliamentary Affairs Babar Awan and Religious Affairs Minister Hamid Saeed Kazmi assured the National Assembly that the government would not support the reported recommendation by the Council of Islamic Ideology that a divorce should go into effect within three months of a woman’s request for it, even if her husband did not respond by that time. Minister for Law and Justice Farooq Naek said that these were only recommendations of the CII and these would become law only if parliament approved them. He said that no law against the Holy Quran and Sunnah would be passed.

    However, the way the enlightened PPP government has distanced itself from the CII recommendation show that they are being politicised. For example, some of the scholars opined that the former president Pervez Musharraf, according to his theory of enlightenment, had appointed such persons in the CII who were not capable of issuing religious decrees (fatwas). But the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan led by Asma Jahangir, an enlightened friend of Benazir Bhutto, has called on Asif Ali Zardari, the president of the country, to immediately frame the laws in line with the CII’s recommendations. “These recommendations are no doubt very positive, sensible and logical and the government should implement them forthwith without any fear of bigotry. Disowning the recommendations of the CII would stir more trouble and the Pakistan government should better place them before the National Assembly to reach a consensus. By disowning the CII recommendations, the government would be giving in to extremist hardliners who have repeatedly tarnished the name of Islam to promote their vested interests”, Asma Jahangir added

    amir.mir1969@gmail.com

    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email WhatsApp Copy Link
    Previous ArticleSyria’s Reactor: Can the IAEA Act Effectively?
    Next Article Defense establishment paper: Golan for Syria peace, plan for Iran strike

    Comments are closed.

    RSS Recent post in french
    • La liberté comme dette — et comme devoir trahi par les gouvernants 2 January 2026 Walid Sinno
    • La « Gap Law »: pourquoi la précipitation, et pourquoi les Français ? 30 December 2025 Pierre-Étienne Renaudin
    • Au Liban, une réforme cruciale pour sortir enfin de la crise 23 December 2025 Sibylle Rizk
    • Le Grand Hôtel Abysse sert toujours des repas en 2025 16 December 2025 Walid Sinno
    • Au cœur de Paris, l’opaque machine à cash de l’élite libanaise 5 December 2025 Clément Fayol
    RSS Recent post in arabic
    • هل الجمهورية الإسلامية على وشك الانهيار؟ 9 January 2026 خاص بالشفاف
    • بدلاً من معالجة مشكلة النفايات: حملات على قرارات صيدا وعلى حساب الناس وصحتهم 9 January 2026 وفيق هواري
    • ( شاهد الفيديو) الحاكم للرأي العام:  استرداد الأموال المختلسة، وأصول المركزي، سيوفر السيولة لسداد حقوق المودعين 8 January 2026 الشفّاف
    • رسالة مفتوحة من المخرج الإيراني “محسن مخملباف” إلى “رضا بهلوي” 8 January 2026 خاص بالشفاف
    • البنوك اللبنانية: أعذارُكم لم تَعُد مقبولة! 8 January 2026 وليد سنّو
    26 February 2011

    Metransparent Preliminary Black List of Qaddafi’s Financial Aides Outside Libya

    6 December 2008

    Interview with Prof Hafiz Mohammad Saeed

    7 July 2009

    The messy state of the Hindu temples in Pakistan

    27 July 2009

    Sayed Mahmoud El Qemany Apeal to the World Conscience

    8 March 2022

    Russian Orthodox priests call for immediate end to war in Ukraine

    Recent Comments
    • P. Akel on The Grand Hôtel Abysse Is Serving Meals in 2025
    • Rev Aso Patrick Vakporaye on Sex Talk for Muslim Women
    • Sarah Akel on The KGB’s Middle East Files: Palestinians in the service of Mother Russia
    • Andrew Campbell on The KGB’s Middle East Files: Palestinians in the service of Mother Russia
    • farouk itani on A Year Later, Lebanon Still Won’t Stand Up to Hezbollah
    Donate
    © 2026 Middle East Transparent

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.