Close Menu
    Facebook Instagram LinkedIn
    • العربية (Arabic)
    • English
    • Français (French)
    Facebook Instagram LinkedIn
    Middle East Transparent
    • Home
    • Categories
      1. Headlines
      2. Features
      3. Commentary
      4. Magazine
      5. Cash economy
      Featured
      Headlines NYT

      How a Call From Trump Ignited a Bitter Feud Between Two U.S. Allies

      Recent
      1 March 2026

      How a Call From Trump Ignited a Bitter Feud Between Two U.S. Allies

      28 February 2026

      Between fire and silence: Türkiye in the shadow of a growing regional war

      26 February 2026

      Trump and Iran Are Playing a Game of Chicken

    • Contact us
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • العربية (Arabic)
    • English
    • Français (French)
    Middle East Transparent
    You are at:Home»Neither Arab nor Spring

    Neither Arab nor Spring

    0
    By Sarah Akel on 6 December 2011 Uncategorized

    The vicissitudes that have, for some reason, been collectively dubbed the ‘Arab Spring’ are neither Arab nor Spring. One can say that they are actually living proof of the identity crisis and reverberating bankruptcy of Arab nationalism.

    The vicissitudes that have, for some reason, been collectively dubbed the “Arab Spring” are neither Arab nor Spring. One can say that they are actually living proof of the identity crisis and reverberating bankruptcy of Arab nationalism. We must remember that the intifadas that brought the masses to the streets took place in countries that have been ruled by governments considered to be nationalist. They passed over the monarchies, and there is a simple reason for that.

    From the first days of Islam, through to the disintegration of the Ottoman empire, the Arab world has been ruled by monarchies in the form of various caliphs. The first caliphs were Arabs who conquered land and established empires. In Arab lands, the legitimacy conferred on rulers was fundamentally tribal, and resembled monarchy. Over time, Arab rule weakened. The caliphates remained Islamic, but the caliphs were no longer of Arab descent.

    Nationalism was a new idea. The founding of Arab nationalism had two phases: First there was traditional Bedouin nationalism, while urban nationalism developed later. Traditional nationalism was encouraged by Britain, the colonial power that sought to secure hold of the important areas by taking them over from the Ottomans. Lord Horatio Kitchener, who served as the British secretary of state for war during World War I, actively pursued this goal, working to restore the Arab caliphates.

    We know about this from a letter sent in August 1915 from Sir Henry McMahon, the British high commissioner in Egypt, to Hussein bin Ali, the sharif of Mecca: “We rejoice, moreover, that your Highness and your people are of one opinion – that Arab interests are English interests and English Arab. To this intent we confirm to you the terms of Lord Kitchener’s message, which reached you by the hand of Ali Effendi, and in which was stated clearly our desire for the independence of Arabia and its inhabitants, together with our approval of the Arab Khalifate when it should be proclaimed. We declare once more that His Majesty’s Government would welcome the resumption of the Khalifate by an Arab of true race.”

    The region was ultimately left without either an Ottoman caliphate or an Arab one. It was divided between Britain and France, and the Arabs got the condolence prize: the Arab League.

    The second phase of Arab nationalism developed in the context of the colonial powers’ withdrawal from the region and the Cold War. The Arab world, which was divided into “autonomous” entities, continued to be ruled by puppets controlled from afar. Then a new player – the Soviet Union – entered the fray, and the new nationalism fell into the net of the Soviet bloc. This nationalism was created in an unnatural process. Junior officers had brutally raped their people and their lands, and a new kind of regime was born of this assault: a political bastard in the Arab world, neither a monarchy nor a republic.

    These governments promised the world, and national pride, but their existence was essentially dependent on empty slogans. All their energy went into maintaining their hold on the reins of power, at any price. And that’s how the Arab world got where it is today. One can say that Arab nationalism, in both its empty forms, flunked the reality test.

    There is an Arabic phrase that tells us the drowning man hangs by ropes made of air. These days, the ropes of air are being held out to the Arab world by the modern-day successors of Kitchener and McMahon. This time, it is being done through assistance to Sunni Arab Islam and with prominent Turkish-Ottoman support, in the hope that the new regimes will counter the increasingly strong Shi’ite Islam at Iran’s helm. But this is just another golem that is liable to turn on its maker.

    *

    Published: Opinion-Haaretz, 5 Dec. 2011

    ***

    For Hebrew, press here

    http://salmaghari-en.blogspot.com/2011/12/neither-arab-nor-spring.html

    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email WhatsApp Copy Link
    Previous ArticleReport shows that Salafists, Mubaraks, not April 6 Youth Movement, receive millions in foreign funding
    Next Article Assad in complete Denial

    Comments are closed.

    RSS Recent post in french
    • En Arabie saoudite, le retour au réalisme de « MBS », contraint d’en rabattre sur ses projets pharaoniques 27 February 2026 Hélène Sallon
    • À Benghazi, quinze ans après, les espoirs déçus de la révolution libyenne 18 February 2026 Maryline Dumas
    • Dans le nord de la Syrie, le barrage de Tichrine, la forteresse qui a résisté aux remous de la guerre civile 17 February 2026 Hélène Sallon
    • Pourquoi le Koweït a classé huit hôpitaux libanais sur la liste du terrorisme ? 8 February 2026 Dr. Fadil Hammoud
    • En Orient, le goût exotique de la liberté est éphémère 30 January 2026 Charles Jaigu
    RSS Recent post in arabic
    • اضطرَّ لتقليص مشاريعه العملاقة: عودة محمد بن سلمان إلى الواقعية 27 February 2026 إيلين سالون
    • “اتفاق جيد” مع إيران؟ متطلبات منع اندلاع أزمة نووية في المستقبل 26 February 2026 زوهار بالتي
    • سيدة المفاجآت تعزز قبضتها على السلطة في اليابان 25 February 2026 د. عبدالله المدني
    • سياسة “الاستشهاد” عند خامنئي: من غير المرجح أن يقبل زعيم إيران الاستسلام لأمريكا 25 February 2026 آرش رئيسي نجاد
    • الجماعة الإسلامية عند مفترق طرق 24 February 2026 محمد فواز
    26 February 2011

    Metransparent Preliminary Black List of Qaddafi’s Financial Aides Outside Libya

    6 December 2008

    Interview with Prof Hafiz Mohammad Saeed

    7 July 2009

    The messy state of the Hindu temples in Pakistan

    27 July 2009

    Sayed Mahmoud El Qemany Apeal to the World Conscience

    8 March 2022

    Russian Orthodox priests call for immediate end to war in Ukraine

    Recent Comments
    • me Me on The Disturbing Question at the Heart of the Trump-Zelensky Drama
    • me Me on The Disturbing Question at the Heart of the Trump-Zelensky Drama
    • کمیسیون پارلمان ترکیه قانون موقتی را برای روند خلع سلاح پ ک ک پیشنهاد کرد - MORSHEDI on Turkish parliamentary commission proposes temporary law for PKK disarmament process
    • سیاست آمریکا در قبال لبنان: موانعی برای از بین بردن قدرت حزب الله - MORSHEDI on U.S. Policy Toward Lebanon: Obstacles to Dismantling Hezbollah’s Grip on Power
    • Mehdi El Husseini on Correction on “Inside the Bank Audi Play Article”!
    Donate
    © 2026 Middle East Transparent

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.