Close Menu
    Facebook Instagram LinkedIn
    • العربية (Arabic)
    • English
    • Français (French)
    Facebook Instagram LinkedIn
    Middle East Transparent
    • Home
    • Categories
      1. Headlines
      2. Features
      3. Commentary
      4. Magazine
      Featured
      Headlines Saad Azhari

      Facts and Myths in the Lebanese Financial Crisis

      Recent
      9 July 2025

      Facts and Myths in the Lebanese Financial Crisis

      6 July 2025

      A New Palestinian Offer for Peace With Israel

      3 July 2025

      Why al-Sharaa’s success in Syria is good for Israel and the US

    • Contact us
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • العربية (Arabic)
    • English
    • Français (French)
    Middle East Transparent
    You are at:Home»Categories»Headlines»Its « proxies » reinvigorated :  Iran « very bad » provisional nuclear deal within days!

    Its « proxies » reinvigorated :  Iran « very bad » provisional nuclear deal within days!

    0
    By Pierre Akel on 20 February 2022 Headlines

     Accord not to cover Iran’s distabilization actions, atomic bomb “weaponization” and nuclear-capable missiles!

     

     

     METransparent Exclusive

     Reliable European sources told METransparent that a new « provisional » nuclear agreement with Iran will be signed in Vienna within days.

     

    Sources revealed that the Iranians did not agree to destroy their « advanced » centrifuges.  Iran  also succeeded in « reducing » the IAEA monitoring of their facilities!

     The deal would allow Iran to resell its oil and would lift some (but not all) sanctions, perhaps gradually.

     Sources emphasized that the resumption of oil sales does not preclude Iran from refinancing  Hezbollah and other « proxies » in Iraq, Yemen, Syria and elsewhere.  It is noteworthy, here, that European sources had confirmed, months back, that Iran would agree to the signing of “secret annexes” pertaining to the “dismantling” of its main agent in the region, “Hezbollah”, plus its other “proxies”! 

     What happens to the large quantities of highly enriched uranium that Iran now possesses?

    Sources believe that two solutions will be adopted:  « dilution » and sending a portion of the enriched uranium to Russia, as was the case in the 2015 accord.

    However, a Russian invasion of Ukraine would be bad for Iran as it could complicate the Russian part of the solution.

     While the new accord does not deal with Iran’s destabilization activities in Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Yemen and the Gulf, it seems, also, not to cover the activities pertaining to the development of an atomic bomb which Europeans, Americans and Israelis know are still continuing in »“undeclared sites » in Iran.

     Nor does the new agreement cover the so-called “weaponisation” of the atomic bomb that Iran could have the ability to produce within a short period:  developing missiles capable of delivering the bomb on the one hand and, perhaps most important, developing « detonators » for an atomic bomb.  It is believed that Iran has made “a huge progress” in this last field!

     Was Khamenei’s speech last week « vowing »that Iran does not seek to produce atomic weapons an « assurance » requested by Iran’s « partners » ?  « Perhaps », irrespective of the credibility of such assurances!

    Arabs and Israelis seem to the losers in this new accord, sources say!  Recalling that they had, already, expected the Middle East to « implode » after the “bad deal” signed in 2015- as actually happened.

    The “ambiguity” about the “the atomic bomb weaponizing” may serve Israel, which will not be able to strike at the « declared enrichment facilities », except that nothing (in theory) prevents  striking at « undeclared » Iranian nuclear sites!  On the other hand, Arabs cannot do much against the billions that Iran will allocate from its oil revenues, to its “proxies”! 

    Why did the U.S. and Europe  agree to such a “very bad” accord? sources explained that President Biden had pledged to reverse President Trump’s decisions on the nuclear deal.

    No regime change « headache »!

     More importantly, it was claimed, last year, that the Biden administration had received internal evaluations  concluding that the U.S. might be capable of « bringing down the Iranian regime, now”!  If it wanted to!

    Obviously, that was contrary to claims by many U.S. « analysts » about “Iran’s steadfastness in the face of the maximum US sanctions »!  On the contrary, a document (in Persian) was leaked a month ago, in which Iran’s Revolutionary Public Prosecutor, called for “restricting social networks” or even cutting them completely, if no agreement is reached in Vienna!  Iranian authorities, clearly, fear an explosion of popular resentment if the last “window of hope” represented by the Vienna negotiations is closed.

    Anyway, European sources add that a project of « regime » change, which will inevitably “destabilize the Middle East”, is not on President Biden’s agenda!

    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email WhatsApp Copy Link
    Previous Articleواردات الفحم تربك الاقتصاد الصيني
    Next Article محنة « كتائب » سامر سعادة البترونية 
    Subscribe
    Notify of
    guest

    guest

    0 Comments
    Newest
    Oldest Most Voted
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    RSS Recent post in french
    • Du Liban indépendant et de son « héritage syrien » (avec nouvelles cartes) 8 July 2025 Jack Keilo
    • Nouvelle approche des Forces Libanaises: Alliances ou Endiguement ? 5 July 2025 Kamal Richa
    • Ce que nous attendons de vous, Monsieur le Président 3 July 2025 Michel Hajji Georgiou
    • Il faut être pour Nétanyahou lorsqu’il affaiblit la menace iranienne ; et ardemment contre lui lorsqu’il détruit Gaza 1 July 2025 Denis Charbit
    • En Syrie, la mystérieuse disparition du corps de Hafez el-Assad 11 June 2025 Apolline Convain
    RSS Recent post in arabic
    • الانتخابات النيابية اللبنانية بين غياب مشروع الدولة ومتغيرات المشهد الإقليمي 10 July 2025 كمال ريشا
    • !ليس هذا الوقت المناسب للتساهل إزاء حزب الله.. أو إزاء بيروت 9 July 2025 ديفيد شينكر
    • خلافات “فتح” تُحبطُ خطة نزع سلاح المخيمات 9 July 2025 محمد داود العلي
    • الحقائق و”الأساطیر” في الأزمة المالیة اللبنانیة 9 July 2025 سعد أزهري
    • قاعدة نورخان الجوية وأهميتها لواشنطن 9 July 2025 د. عبدالله المدني
    26 February 2011

    Metransparent Preliminary Black List of Qaddafi’s Financial Aides Outside Libya

    6 December 2008

    Interview with Prof Hafiz Mohammad Saeed

    7 July 2009

    The messy state of the Hindu temples in Pakistan

    27 July 2009

    Sayed Mahmoud El Qemany Apeal to the World Conscience

    8 March 2022

    Russian Orthodox priests call for immediate end to war in Ukraine

    Recent Comments
    • Khaled Mahrouq on Why al-Sharaa’s success in Syria is good for Israel and the US
    • Edward Ziadeh on Why al-Sharaa’s success in Syria is good for Israel and the US
    • Giant Squirrel on Holier Than Thou: Politics and the Pulpit in America
    • Edward Ziadeh on As Church awaits a Conclave, President Trump puts up picture of himself as next Pope
    • Victoria Perea on As Church awaits a Conclave, President Trump puts up picture of himself as next Pope
    Donate
    Donate
    © 2025 Middle East Transparent

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    loader

    Inscrivez-vous à la newsletter

    En vous inscrivant, vous acceptez nos conditions et notre politique de confidentialité.

    loader

    Subscribe to updates

    By signing up, you agree to our terms privacy policy agreement.

    loader

    اشترك في التحديثات

    بالتسجيل، فإنك توافق على شروطنا واتفاقية سياسة الخصوصية الخاصة بنا.

    wpDiscuz