Close Menu
    Facebook Instagram LinkedIn
    • العربية (Arabic)
    • English
    • Français (French)
    Facebook Instagram LinkedIn
    Middle East Transparent
    • Home
    • Categories
      1. Headlines
      2. Features
      3. Commentary
      4. Magazine
      Featured
      Headlines Hussain Abdul-Hussain

      Inside the harrowing attack on Syria’s Druze — and why the US’ first in the right direction is vita

      Recent
      28 July 2025

      Inside the harrowing attack on Syria’s Druze — and why the US’ first in the right direction is vita

      23 July 2025

      Türkiye’s fight against fragmentation abroad, ethnic flirtation at home

      22 July 2025

      Lebanese Central Bank Lands a Blow on Hezbollah’s Finances, but It’s Not Enough

    • Contact us
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • العربية (Arabic)
    • English
    • Français (French)
    Middle East Transparent
    You are at:Home»Categories»Headlines»Gaza – The Day After And The Way Forward

    Gaza – The Day After And The Way Forward

    0
    By Yigal Carmon on 8 March 2025 Headlines
    إستماع
    Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

    The media, which should have known better, are talking about the day after the Gaza war as if it will be characterized by a political solution for peace. This is the last thing that will be possible after the war ends, if and when it does. Arab positions have become severely radicalized, and this is because the war in Gaza and on Israel’s northern border have given rise to new hope in the hearts of the Palestinians and the Arabs. This new hope is based on the belief that Israel is not as strong as they thought and as it presented itself, and that in fact according to the testimony of Israelis themselves – on numerous television shows – had Hizbullah done as expected, that is, fire thousands of missiles a day out of its arsenal of 150,000 and unleash its Radwan force to raid the Galilee, it is not clear that Israel would still be in existence today.

     

    The Arabs have also learned that taking hostages is a strategic weapon to be used against those with Western values. It should be assumed that in any future war in which one side is Western, whether Israel or anyone else, this weapon will be used.

    For these reasons, the chance of a successful arrangement is now much lower than it was previously.

    In addition, in light of the catastrophes that the war has brought, the Arabs have learned that the use of Arab civilians as human shields is highly effective against Israel and similar foes. This is because in the end, the Western world does not blame Hamas for taking hostages and using their own people as human shields, but blames Israel for fighting for its life.

    All this has given the Arabs and Palestinians new hope. It is not yet the time to make peace – only temporary arrangements.

    In light of this situation, there are two approaches: One is that of President Trump, and the other is that of Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu, Qatar, Hamas, and U.S. Special Envoy Steve Witkoff. Trump’s approach is drastic: Free all the hostages, or there will be hell to pay. Or, in the absence of peace, evacuate everyone from Gaza and turn it into a riviera.

    In contrast, there is the phased approach of agreements – another five hostages, another 10 hostages, another cohort of several hundred Palestinian security prisoners released, another 30 days, another 42 days. This is the approach favored by the Netanyahu-Qatar-Hamas-Witkoff quartet.

    Without judging the practicality or morality of either of these approaches, and while many protest against the Trump plan as immoral, but have nothing to say about immorality of Hamas’s plan to transfer all the Jews out of Israel after they win (that is, the Jews who survive the coming massacre), what is clear is that at this point, no solution is possible. Inter alia, this is because the Arab countries, including those who signed peace agreements with Israel such as the UAE, have no real interest in peace with Israel. This is after Israel proved to be treacherous – namely, after the UAE made peace with Israel, Israel went with Qatar, the UAE’s enemy and the foremost sponsor of Islamist terrorism worldwide. As for Egypt, all it wants is a fat cut of the Gaza reconstruction funds.

    Tomorrow, March 4, the Cairo conference postponed from February 27 will take place. Today, they are already saying that there will be another conference in Riyadh on March 6. The disagreements among all the Arab elements and the Palestinians vis-à-vis the future are such that it is hard to believe that anything will emerge from these conferences.

    What Should An Palestinian-Arab Conference Discuss In Order To Achieve Peace?

    Before getting to specific solutions, it must discuss questions of principle – that is, the question of their approach to Israel. The Palestinians are facing an existential test. They must recognize the fact that the Jewish people have deep roots in the land that was theirs 2,000 years ago, and that the Jews can further expand this connection despite the Palestinians’ violent attacks. Thus, in order to save what remains of Palestine, the Palestinians must completely give up the idea of return to pre-1967 Israel – the return that was promoted over the decades by the UN, via UNRWA, and that means the end of Israel. No other group of refugees has ever had such an idea nurtured in their midst – just the Palestinians.  

    The Palestinians must change their approach to Israel and the Jews. Even then, their future as a people is not assured. This choice is tough as hell – but what is certain is that if they do not choose it, after nearly 77 years of Israel’s existence, they will be lost as a people.

    They can learn from the Zionist leader David Ben Gurion, who was ready to accept any partition plan, partial as it was. They can also learn from the Zionist leader Yigal Allon, who maintained that this is our land, but that this does not mean that it cannot be shared or divided, out of humane concerns.

    There is an urgent need for this decision. At this very moment, before the war is renewed in full force, will the Palestinians have the strength to make such a decision? Apparently not. The Jews accepted it only after the Jewish leadership – Ben Gurion, Allon – did so because the Jewish people had already experienced 2,000 years of suffering and persecution culminating in the Holocaust, choosing survival and humanity. For Hamas and the Palestinians, as for most of the Arabs, their political culture is one of victory, and Islam is a religion of empowerment and triumph. Survival and humanity are not built into their political and religious culture, as they are for the Jews.

    Two weeks after the war began, on October 23, 2023, I published an article titled About the Future. In it, I wrote that the war would continue for about another decade. When asked why I was so pessimistic, I said, “Pessimistic? I am realistic. It could take a lot longer.”

    As the renowned Moroccan liberal intellectual Tahar ben Jelloun, idol of the left in Europe, put it sorrowfully but truthfully: “The Palestinian cause died on October 7, 2023, murdered by fanatic elements mired in an Islamist ideology of the worst kind.”

    * Yigal Carmon is Founder and President of MEMRI.

    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email WhatsApp Copy Link
    Previous ArticleA Central Bank Coup in Beirut
    Next Article Kuwait: The Gulf state purging tens of thousands of its citizens
    Subscribe
    Notify of
    guest

    guest

    0 Comments
    Newest
    Oldest Most Voted
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    RSS Recent post in french
    • « Vers le sauvetage »: Pour mettre fin à l’hémorragie chiite… et lancer le redressement économique 18 July 2025 Nahwa al Inqaz
    • Du Liban indépendant et de son « héritage syrien » (avec nouvelles cartes) 8 July 2025 Jack Keilo
    • Nouvelle approche des Forces Libanaises: Alliances ou Endiguement ? 5 July 2025 Kamal Richa
    • Ce que nous attendons de vous, Monsieur le Président 3 July 2025 Michel Hajji Georgiou
    • Il faut être pour Nétanyahou lorsqu’il affaiblit la menace iranienne ; et ardemment contre lui lorsqu’il détruit Gaza 1 July 2025 Denis Charbit
    RSS Recent post in arabic
    • إلى د. رَضوان السيّد: ديمقراطية سوريا.. واستقلال لبنان! 29 July 2025 بيار عقل
    • برّاك لن يعود الى لبنان وتل ابيب ستنزع سلاح حزب الله 29 July 2025 خاص بالشفاف
    • النشاط الصهيوني في الشام  28 July 2025 سلمان مصالحة
    • التأكد من أن دمشق تستخلص الدروس الصحيحة من اشتباكات السويداء 27 July 2025 أندرو جي تابلر
    • حول زوبعة “خور عبدالله” 27 July 2025 شفاف- خاص
    26 February 2011

    Metransparent Preliminary Black List of Qaddafi’s Financial Aides Outside Libya

    6 December 2008

    Interview with Prof Hafiz Mohammad Saeed

    7 July 2009

    The messy state of the Hindu temples in Pakistan

    27 July 2009

    Sayed Mahmoud El Qemany Apeal to the World Conscience

    8 March 2022

    Russian Orthodox priests call for immediate end to war in Ukraine

    Recent Comments
    • K Khairallah on Türkiye’s fight against fragmentation abroad, ethnic flirtation at home
    • Elie Abdul Hay on Türkiye’s fight against fragmentation abroad, ethnic flirtation at home
    • Khairallah Khairallah on Türkiye’s fight against fragmentation abroad, ethnic flirtation at home
    • Khaled Mahrouq on Why al-Sharaa’s success in Syria is good for Israel and the US
    • Edward Ziadeh on Why al-Sharaa’s success in Syria is good for Israel and the US
    Donate
    Donate
    © 2025 Middle East Transparent

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    loader

    Inscrivez-vous à la newsletter

    En vous inscrivant, vous acceptez nos conditions et notre politique de confidentialité.

    loader

    Subscribe to updates

    By signing up, you agree to our terms privacy policy agreement.

    loader

    اشترك في التحديثات

    بالتسجيل، فإنك توافق على شروطنا واتفاقية سياسة الخصوصية الخاصة بنا.

    wpDiscuz