Close Menu
    Facebook Instagram LinkedIn
    • العربية (Arabic)
    • English
    • Français (French)
    Facebook Instagram LinkedIn
    Middle East Transparent
    • Home
    • Categories
      1. Headlines
      2. Features
      3. Commentary
      4. Magazine
      Featured
      Headlines Yusuf Kanli

      Türkiye’s fight against fragmentation abroad, ethnic flirtation at home

      Recent
      23 July 2025

      Türkiye’s fight against fragmentation abroad, ethnic flirtation at home

      22 July 2025

      Lebanese Central Bank Lands a Blow on Hezbollah’s Finances, but It’s Not Enough

      22 July 2025

      Druze Revolts, Then And Now

    • Contact us
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • العربية (Arabic)
    • English
    • Français (French)
    Middle East Transparent
    You are at:Home»Wikileaks revelations exacerbating Hizbollah-Amal tensions in South Lebanon

    Wikileaks revelations exacerbating Hizbollah-Amal tensions in South Lebanon

    0
    By Sarah Akel on 14 October 2011 Uncategorized

    Najah Khalil, in South Lebanon

    To the memory of its people, the state of insecurity and terror imposed by the Hizbollah militia upon the region of South Lebanon during the last few months seems unprecedented- with the exception of tight control measures imposed by the Israeli forces until the end of the occupation in 2000.

    Inhabitants of southern towns and villages, not excluding women, children, and the elderly, are, regularly, subject to punitive “campaigns”, led by Hezbollah strong hands. In addition to retribution and enforcing of a Hizbollah discipline on villagers, such campaigns seem destined to instill a sentiment of fear that would preclude any inclination towards disobedience or revolt.

    ‫F‬ights have, recently, been spreading like wildfire in South Lebanon villages. Not a day passes without some “incident” occurring. Usually quarrels start verbally then degenerate into fistfights and knives, sometimes ending with gunfire.

    The spiral of violence had first erupted between the two nominal allies: Amal Movement and Hezbollah. Due to its superiority in arms, better organization and larger membership, Hezbollah would prevail in these occasional confrontations between the two so-called “allies”, but, in fact, “rivals”. This has made Hezbollah partisans arrogant and Amal followers frustrated.

    Amal movement supporters in the south are suffering from Hezbollah domination, the more so since Amal leadership’s interests seem limited to the temptations of power and wealth, making their audience in the south a victim to deals with the Hezbollah adversary.

    Lately, clashes first started in the southern village of Aytaroun (historically, a communist stronghold) where an Amal supporter was beaten because his clothes were not to the liking of Hezbollah supporters! Ten people were wounded by knives in the clash that ensued.

    Confrontations then spread to other villages, seemingly to achieve the purpose of humiliating southerners of “dissident” opinions, even by the force of arms.

    Clashes spread to Adayse, Rebtleteen, and Markaba villages, where Amal supporters were victims of all kinds of physical and mental harassment. Knife wounds, head injuries, and severe beatings are some of what they have been subjected to, as well as a great deal of cursing and insults, not even sparing girls and elders in the three towns. The confrontations lasted about a week, and many of the wounded are still being treated in various hospitals.

    Confrontations in the above mentioned villages consecrated the domination of Hezbollah on all the border region, removing Amal from the geographical and political equation and from control over this sensitive area.

    The Wikileaks effect

    Observers in the South could not but notice that Hezbollah members would start their disciplinary actions against Amal movement supporters after the publication of new Wikileaks documents by the Beirut press, such documents, often, revealing how Amal leadership had “betrayed” its ally during and after the 2006 war with Israel. The problem is that Amal supporters in South Lebanon, not Amal’s national leadership, are paying for the so-called “betrayal” of their leaders.

    Amal leadership’s silence over the harassment of its supporters in South Lebanon, not to mention the apathy of the lebanese judiciary and security authorities, seem to have opened Hezbollah supporters’ appetite to resume the logic of “prevailing over all segments of society”, where even leftist, communists and independent citizens have received their share of harrassment.

    The recent “prohibition of alcohol” clashes, in Nabatiyeh and Marjehyoun areas, have demonstrated Hezbollah’s tendency to “annihilate” anyone whose thoughts, styles, and doctrines are different. Yet, they might, also, signal the party’s latent fear of the spread of dissident voices- which would explain why it had to harass members of the Communist Party celebrating the birth date of the Lebanese Resistance Front during the Israeli occupation in the village of Adloun, near Zahrani.

    Yet, the “de facto” weapons, a term used by the Beirut press, which have wreaked havoc in the south happen to be, also, corrupt.  A feast does not end with the wolves devouring the prey. Wolves might even attempt to devour each other too! This happened in the village of Jibshit, a stronghold of Hezbollah, where the tyranny of party “ Rabet ” (Hizbollah “link man”) triggered three rounds of clashes among Hizbollah members, ending in the beating of Hizbollah’s “rabet“, breaking the mayor’s car, with threats of more if the Hezbollah leadership does not put an end to the tyranny of its local man (Hezbollah, later, claimed the protestors were young drug addicts!)


    South Lebanon is, now, mired up in unilateralism, and thugs (what Syrians call “shabbiha“) practices are spreading throughout the region. Hizbollah has become the sole de facto ruler and controller of the southerners lives. Resorting to the logic of arms is no longer an embarrassment to their holders whether for the slightest of incidents, for usurping public domains, or even for corrupting official administrations…Which would be the topic of my next article.

    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email WhatsApp Copy Link
    Previous ArticleIn Syria a U.S. diplomat is leading, not a soldier
    Next Article The Strange Power of Qatar (from the NY Review of Books)

    Comments are closed.

    RSS Recent post in french
    • « Vers le sauvetage »: Pour mettre fin à l’hémorragie chiite… et lancer le redressement économique 18 July 2025 Nahwa al Inqaz
    • Du Liban indépendant et de son « héritage syrien » (avec nouvelles cartes) 8 July 2025 Jack Keilo
    • Nouvelle approche des Forces Libanaises: Alliances ou Endiguement ? 5 July 2025 Kamal Richa
    • Ce que nous attendons de vous, Monsieur le Président 3 July 2025 Michel Hajji Georgiou
    • Il faut être pour Nétanyahou lorsqu’il affaiblit la menace iranienne ; et ardemment contre lui lorsqu’il détruit Gaza 1 July 2025 Denis Charbit
    RSS Recent post in arabic
    • معركة تركيا ضد التقسيم في الخارج مقابل مُغازلة “الأَعراق” في الداخل! 24 July 2025 يوسف كانلي
    • انسحاب القوات الأميركية من المنطقة غير وارد 24 July 2025 هدى الحسيني
    • لكي ينجو اليسار العالمي من الانقراض: “الوصايا العشر”! 24 July 2025 سعيد ناشيد
    • هل يُستدعى “جبران باسيل” للمثول امام القضاء؟ 23 July 2025 خاص بالشفاف
    • الشَعرة التي انقَطَعت في السُويداء 23 July 2025 سلمان مصالحة
    26 February 2011

    Metransparent Preliminary Black List of Qaddafi’s Financial Aides Outside Libya

    6 December 2008

    Interview with Prof Hafiz Mohammad Saeed

    7 July 2009

    The messy state of the Hindu temples in Pakistan

    27 July 2009

    Sayed Mahmoud El Qemany Apeal to the World Conscience

    8 March 2022

    Russian Orthodox priests call for immediate end to war in Ukraine

    Recent Comments
    • K Khairallah on Türkiye’s fight against fragmentation abroad, ethnic flirtation at home
    • Elie Abdul Hay on Türkiye’s fight against fragmentation abroad, ethnic flirtation at home
    • Khairallah Khairallah on Türkiye’s fight against fragmentation abroad, ethnic flirtation at home
    • Khaled Mahrouq on Why al-Sharaa’s success in Syria is good for Israel and the US
    • Edward Ziadeh on Why al-Sharaa’s success in Syria is good for Israel and the US
    Donate
    Donate
    © 2025 Middle East Transparent

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    loader

    Inscrivez-vous à la newsletter

    En vous inscrivant, vous acceptez nos conditions et notre politique de confidentialité.

    loader

    Subscribe to updates

    By signing up, you agree to our terms privacy policy agreement.

    loader

    اشترك في التحديثات

    بالتسجيل، فإنك توافق على شروطنا واتفاقية سياسة الخصوصية الخاصة بنا.