Close Menu
    Facebook Instagram LinkedIn
    • العربية (Arabic)
    • English
    • Français (French)
    Facebook Instagram LinkedIn
    Middle East Transparent
    • Home
    • Categories
      1. Headlines
      2. Features
      3. Commentary
      4. Magazine
      5. Cash economy
      Featured
      Headlines Shaffaf Exclusive

      Talk and Plot: Teheran Double Game with the Sharaa Regime

      Recent
      6 January 2026

      Talk and Plot: Teheran Double Game with the Sharaa Regime

      5 January 2026

      When “law enforcement” looks like piracy: The Maduro seizure, Türkiye’s caution, and the “precedent” problem

      5 January 2026

      The Financial Stabilization and Deposits Repayment Act: A Controversial Step in Lebanon’s Crisis Management

    • Contact us
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • العربية (Arabic)
    • English
    • Français (French)
    Middle East Transparent
    You are at:Home»WHAT IF TURKEY INVADED SYRIA?

    WHAT IF TURKEY INVADED SYRIA?

    0
    By Sarah Akel on 11 July 2011 Uncategorized

    Hurriyet Daily News

    Turkish-Syrian ties are unraveling. After becoming Assad’s close ally, Ankara is now worried about the Syrian conflict. Turkey has expressed outrage at the situation, calling the crackdown in Syria a “savagery,” and a Turkish army commander recently issued a tacit warning while visiting the Syrian border. Meanwhile, Damascus has positioned tanks along its border with Turkey.

    Still, when reacting to the unrest in Syria, the instinct of the Justice and Development Party, or AKP, government in Ankara will be to avoid conflict and opt for a buffer zone inside Syria to manage the likely flow of refugees on Syrian territory. But if that does not work, Turkey could take matters into its own hands, sending troops into Syria.

    Did I just say Turkey might invade Syria? Yes. And what a can of worms such an intervention would open, humanitarian though it would be. As the Syrian crisis spills over into Turkey, the AKP’s conflict avoidance policy may not be sustainable. Should the Assad regime carry out massacres in large cities, the AKP might find Turkish sympathies for the persecuted fellow Muslims next door too unbearable to ignore. Massacres in Syria, coupled with the breakdown of law and order, would make Turkish intervention almost inevitable. A Turkish intervention in Syria could change almost everything about the Turkey we know today. For instance, domestic politics. Although Turkey is split down the middle between the AKP’s supporters and their opponents, war would unify domestic opposition behind the AKP leader and Turkish prime minister Erdogan. But it is worth considering that a successful military campaign would also re-empower the secular Turkish army, which has lost face in recent years for purported involvement in a coup plot against the AKP. As for foreign policy, a Turkish intervention would nearly revolutionize the AKP’s regional agenda.

    Strong ties with Syria that the AKP has cultivated since 2002 would crumble in the case of an invasion. In 1998, Damascus stopped allowing the Kurdistan Workers Party to use its territory to launch terror attacks into Turkey, when Ankara threatened to invade Syria. Since then, the Turks have come to believe that Syria is neither a threat nor a source of instability and that Israel is the true problem in the region. This view would change with a Turkish intrusion into Syria, as would Turkey’s relationship with Israel, harkening back to the 1990s, when the two countries united against Damascus for its harboring of terrorist groups. The AKP’s decision to pressure Turkey’s NGOs to disengage from this year’s Gaza flotilla signifies the renewal of a Turkish realization that Israel could be an ally in an unstable region.

    In addition to reconfiguring Turkish-Israeli-Syrian ties, a Turkish incursion would drive a wedge between Ankara and Tehran, thus ending the honeymoon Ankara has pursued with Tehran since the Iraq War, when the two countries found themselves allied in their opposition to the U.S.-led campaign. Today, Ankara and Tehran are at odds; their policies on Syria are diametrically opposed. In the event of a Turkish intervention in Syria, the competition between Ankara and Tehran for influence in Iraq would further compound the situation. Such an intervention would deteriorate Turkey and Iran’s increasingly problematic relationship.

    A Turkish invasion would rejuvenate Turkish-U.S. ties, which have yet to recover fully from the Iraq War. Since 2003, many Turks have come to believe that the U.S. does not care for Turkey and that the two countries have conflicting interests in the Middle East. But now, Turkey and the U.S. are on the same page. Both countries resent crackdown and fear a likely refugee crisis. The crisis in Syria is leading the U.S. and Turkey to coordinate their Middle East policies to an extent not seen for nearly a decade. A Turkish intervention in Syria, backed by the U.S. to uphold the nascent doctrine of “responsibility to protect,” would indeed warm up U.S.-Turkish ties beyond imagination. A can of worms, indeed.

    Soner Cagaptay is director of the Turkish Research Program at The Washington Institute.

    To view this article on the Washington Institute website

    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email WhatsApp Copy Link
    Previous ArticleThe future of the “Arab Spring” held back by poverty and fundamentalism
    Next Article Najib Mikati, our own dead man walking

    Comments are closed.

    RSS Recent post in french
    • La liberté comme dette — et comme devoir trahi par les gouvernants 2 January 2026 Walid Sinno
    • La « Gap Law »: pourquoi la précipitation, et pourquoi les Français ? 30 December 2025 Pierre-Étienne Renaudin
    • Au Liban, une réforme cruciale pour sortir enfin de la crise 23 December 2025 Sibylle Rizk
    • Le Grand Hôtel Abysse sert toujours des repas en 2025 16 December 2025 Walid Sinno
    • Au cœur de Paris, l’opaque machine à cash de l’élite libanaise 5 December 2025 Clément Fayol
    RSS Recent post in arabic
    • مشروع قانون الانتظام المالي وسداد الودائع: خطوة مثيرة للجدل في إدارة ازمة لبنان! 6 January 2026 سمارة القزّي
    • التدخل العسكري.. والمعيار الأخلاقي 6 January 2026 فاخر السلطان
    • لعبة طهران المزدوجة مع نظام الشَّرَع: عروض مالية وتحريك “الساحل” 6 January 2026 خاص بالشفاف
    • ردّاً على فاخر السلطان: إما قانون دولي يُحترم، أو فوضى يدفع ثمَنَها الجميع 5 January 2026 د. فيصل الصايغ
    • بيان جمعية المصارف حول “مشروع قانون الانتظام المالي واسترداد الودائع” 5 January 2026 الشفّاف
    26 February 2011

    Metransparent Preliminary Black List of Qaddafi’s Financial Aides Outside Libya

    6 December 2008

    Interview with Prof Hafiz Mohammad Saeed

    7 July 2009

    The messy state of the Hindu temples in Pakistan

    27 July 2009

    Sayed Mahmoud El Qemany Apeal to the World Conscience

    8 March 2022

    Russian Orthodox priests call for immediate end to war in Ukraine

    Recent Comments
    • P. Akel on The Grand Hôtel Abysse Is Serving Meals in 2025
    • Rev Aso Patrick Vakporaye on Sex Talk for Muslim Women
    • Sarah Akel on The KGB’s Middle East Files: Palestinians in the service of Mother Russia
    • Andrew Campbell on The KGB’s Middle East Files: Palestinians in the service of Mother Russia
    • farouk itani on A Year Later, Lebanon Still Won’t Stand Up to Hezbollah
    Donate
    © 2026 Middle East Transparent

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.