Close Menu
    Facebook Instagram LinkedIn
    • العربية (Arabic)
    • English
    • Français (French)
    Facebook Instagram LinkedIn
    Middle East Transparent
    • Home
    • Categories
      1. Headlines
      2. Features
      3. Commentary
      4. Magazine
      Featured
      Headlines POLITICO

      Leo is America’s first pope. His worldview appears at odds with ‘America First.’

      Recent
      13 May 2025

      The Pope and the Vatican: Divine Right or Male Monopoly? Elderly Men Excluding Women and Youth in the Name of Heaven

      11 May 2025

      Leo is America’s first pope. His worldview appears at odds with ‘America First.’

      5 May 2025

      Most U.S. Catholics Say They Want the Church To Be ‘More Inclusive’

    • Contact us
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • العربية (Arabic)
    • English
    • Français (French)
    Middle East Transparent
    You are at:Home»There’s no one to vote for

    There’s no one to vote for

    0
    By Sarah Akel on 16 October 2012 Uncategorized

    A secular, liberal, democratic and fair-minded Arab citizen can’t vote for either parties that support the Butcher of Damascus and his ilk, as Hadash and Balad do, or a separatist Muslim party like UAL.

    The country is once again abuzz, as the old cliche goes. Color has returned to the cheeks of all the pundits and politicians. Why? Because Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has decided to call early elections, and he has leapt at the flattering polls that have fallen into his lap and rushed to inform the nation that the running in place will continue for another four years.

    The show will go on for three whole months. Nevertheless, it’s worth paying some attention to one face of the issue – or, to be more precise, many faces – generally kept out of view in this performance.

    Four years ago, I confess, I didn’t vote in the elections. I refrained not because I don’t believe in democracy, but for a very simple reason: There was no one to vote for. And now, wonder of wonders, with new elections upon us, this opinion of mine has received redoubled validity.

    After all, the electoral discourse, which is steadily growing more heated, stinks once again. Like all Israeli elections, this one is being conducted as a “Jewish democratic election,” as befits a “Jewish democratic” state. Beneath this discourse hides a bitter truth: A liberal, secular, democratic, fair-minded Arab citizen has nothing to look for in this election. These “democratic” performances are aimed at establishing governments strictly by and for Jews.

    As things look now, four years later, there is still no one to vote for. There are many reasons for this belief. It’s enough to listen to the party discourse that has erupted on every television screen in recent days and is being voiced from every platform to understand the pointlessness of voting. The pundits and politicians have begun performing their calculations, forming governments and dismantling coalitions, crowning this one or that as the person who will deal with the Iranian threat and appointing John or Jane Doe as his right hand.

    In this “democratic” discourse, one fifth of Israel’s citizens disappear. Year after year, the custom is to lump all Arab voters into a single basket called “the Arab parties.” The media follows the pollsters in this, thereby perpetuating the ignorance of the general public.

    The mobilized Zionist media knows how to take a Jewish MK whom everyone deems kosher, Dov Khenin of the Israel Communist Party, link him up with an Islamist Arab MK, Ibrahim Sarsur of United Arab List, and throw them both into the basket called “the Arab parties.” It goes without saying that the Israel Communist Party is, as its name implies, an Israeli communist party. It has always insisted that it is a patriotic Israeli party with both Jewish and Arab members.

    But the biggest lie of all is the label “Arab” borne by the United Arab List. For in terms of the party’s composition and essence, it is neither Arab nor the least bit united.

    It’s well known that the Arab public is comprised of different communities: Muslims, Christians and Druze. But lo and behold, this party contains not a trace of two of these three communities: Christians and Druze. This shows better than anything else that UAL is at its root a separatist Muslim party, and that is how it is seen by the Arab public itself. This fact is also reflected in the Knesset elections, in which this party doesn’t get a single vote from Christian or Druze voters.

    Therefore, calling UAL a “united Arab” party is nothing but a deception. The existence of such a party, which is strictly for Muslims and the Islamic Movement, on one hand serves the Zionist regime, which emphasizes the “Jewishness” of the state, while on the other hand splintering the Arab public into religious communities, and thus perpetuating the communal divisions within it.

    A secular, liberal, democratic and fair-minded Arab citizen can’t vote for either parties that support the Butcher of Damascus and his ilk, as Hadash and Balad do, or a separatist Muslim party like UAL. Nor can such an Arab citizen vote for the Zionist parties, which exclude him from the government of his country and his homeland for racist reasons. Therefore, in the absence of a truly civic party, there is no one to vote for in these elections.

    *

    Published: Opinion-Haaretz, October 16, 2012

    ***

    For Hebrew, press here

    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email WhatsApp Copy Link
    Previous ArticleTiny Azerbaijan unleashes pop-power against Iran’s mullahs
    Next Article Hizbollah ‘launching rocket attacks into Syria’

    Comments are closed.

    RSS Recent post in french
    • Les premiers secrets de l’élection de Léon XIV 13 May 2025 Jean-Marie Guénois
    • Al-Charaa en visite à Paris : « Les Européens se laissent berner parce qu’ils prennent leurs rêves pour des réalités » 8 May 2025 Hughes Maillot
    • Au Yémen, la surprenante résilience des rebelles houthistes 6 May 2025 Georges Malbrunot
    • Walid Joumblatt, chef politique des Druzes du Liban : « Le pire des scénarios serait que les Druzes syriens soient poussés dans une enclave » 5 May 2025 Laure Stephan
    • Robert Ageneau, théologien : « Il est urgent de réformer, voire d’abolir, la papauté » 4 May 2025 Le Monde
    RSS Recent post in arabic
    • جنوب آسيا يخلط الأوراق مجددا 14 May 2025 د. عبدالله المدني
    • البابا والفاتيكان، حق إلهي أم احتكار ذكوري؟ رجال كهول يُقصون النساء والشباب باسم السماء 13 May 2025 رزكار عقراوي
    • ترمب… حقاً زيارة غير عادية 13 May 2025 عبد الرحمن الراشد
    • الأسرار “الأولى” لانتخاب البابا ليو الرابع عشر 12 May 2025 بيار عقل
    • موضوع الزَكاة والخُمس 12 May 2025 أحمد الصرّاف
    26 February 2011

    Metransparent Preliminary Black List of Qaddafi’s Financial Aides Outside Libya

    6 December 2008

    Interview with Prof Hafiz Mohammad Saeed

    7 July 2009

    The messy state of the Hindu temples in Pakistan

    27 July 2009

    Sayed Mahmoud El Qemany Apeal to the World Conscience

    8 March 2022

    Russian Orthodox priests call for immediate end to war in Ukraine

    Recent Comments
    • Edward Ziadeh on As Church awaits a Conclave, President Trump puts up picture of himself as next Pope
    • Victoria Perea on As Church awaits a Conclave, President Trump puts up picture of himself as next Pope
    • Victoria Perea on As Church awaits a Conclave, President Trump puts up picture of himself as next Pope
    • M sam on Kuwait: The Gulf state purging tens of thousands of its citizens
    • Aadam Peer on How important is the Dome of the Rock in Islam?
    Donate
    Donate
    © 2025 Middle East Transparent

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    loader

    Inscrivez-vous à la newsletter

    En vous inscrivant, vous acceptez nos conditions et notre politique de confidentialité.

    loader

    Subscribe to updates

    By signing up, you agree to our terms privacy policy agreement.

    loader

    اشترك في التحديثات

    بالتسجيل، فإنك توافق على شروطنا واتفاقية سياسة الخصوصية الخاصة بنا.