Close Menu
    Facebook Instagram LinkedIn
    • العربية (Arabic)
    • English
    • Français (French)
    Facebook Instagram LinkedIn
    Middle East Transparent
    • Home
    • Categories
      1. Headlines
      2. Features
      3. Commentary
      4. Magazine
      5. Cash economy
      Featured
      Headlines Samara Azzi

      Correction on “Inside the Bank Audi Play Article”!

      Recent
      28 January 2026

      Correction on “Inside the Bank Audi Play Article”!

      25 January 2026

      Federalism Is the Only Shield Lebanon and Iraq Have Left in a Nuclearizing Middle East

      25 January 2026

      The Panic Seeps to Dodge City

    • Contact us
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • العربية (Arabic)
    • English
    • Français (French)
    Middle East Transparent
    You are at:Home»Categories»Headlines»Russian Military Expert Felgengauer Punctures The Hope That Tension Between China And Taiwan Could Open Up A Second Front To Distract The US

    Russian Military Expert Felgengauer Punctures The Hope That Tension Between China And Taiwan Could Open Up A Second Front To Distract The US

    0
    By Memri on 19 August 2022 Headlines

    The Russian leadership, while refraining from mass mobilization has sought to portray the war in Ukraine as an existential struggle for Russia on the order of the Great Patriotic War against the Nazis. It is therefore entirely appropriate that the term second front crops up in many articles. Sometimes the second front is Russia’s relations with Turkey, at other times it is Russia’s economic pressure on Europe. The most popular and seemingly credible version of the second front is a Chinese assault on Taiwan that will divert the United States from assisting Ukraine. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan and the furious Chinese reaction revived hope that China’s patience was ending and Russia would soon have its second front.[1]

     

    Not so fast, argues military analyst Pavel Felgengauer in an interview with Rosbalt media’s Alexander Zhelenin. China, he predicts, will make a great deal of noise in the media but will not venture an invasion of Taiwan. It is still inferior to the US in air and maritime capabilities and it can count on Australia and Japanese support and perhaps India and the Philippines could join in. Today’s China is not the China of 1950 that could take major casualties in its stride.  As liberal critics of the Putin regime Felgengauer and Zhelenin have been wary of criticizing the regime and the war directly, given Russia’s current political climate. This interview can possibly be seen as an indirect attack on the current policy.

    Rosbalt’s interview with Felgengauer follows below:[2]

     

    In your opinion, will the US have the power and tools not only to confront Russia and help Ukraine, but also to wage combat in the Far East, provided China and North Korea carry out their threats and commence military action?

    To put it in brief, it has enough.

    But if one to remember the Korean War of 1950-53, the Americans had to work hard there…

    During the Korean War, the Americans fought primarily against China. North Korea, which attacked South Korea, was defeated rather quickly and hardly participated in the war afterwards. UN troops headed by the US fought there mainly against the Chinese and the Soviet Union. Now neither Russia nor China will fight in Korea.

    Why?

    Russia doesn’t have the power to do so now, and China is unlikely to intervene in Korean affairs today. Beijing would, naturally, like to maintain this North Korean “padding” but not to the point as to intervene in a military conflict, and fight with America. The Chinese are not ready today to fight in Korea, as they were in the 1950s.

    But you have to agree that the PRC today is immeasurably more powerful both military and economy-wise today, than it was back then…

    True. But America as well has become more powerful.

    And yet, let’s imagine that Kim’s threats will be realized and he attacks South Korea, what will happen then?

    He blabs, so let him blab. But if it comes down to a real clash, North Korea will be swept away. Perhaps, there will be a couple of nuclear strikes against South Korea (such a scenario cannot be ruled out). However, the absolute defeat of North Korea will be very prompt and effective.

    The fact is that the technological gap between the DPRK and the Republic of Korea, is the same as between the DPRK and the US, I’m not even taking about a technological gap of an entire generation but of several generations.

    And what if there will be an escalation around Taiwan as well?

    Anything is possible. But China is not ready for a major war with the US right now, so I believe it will refrain from provoking the latter

    American analysts assume that the PRC could get prepared for such a war by 2030, but not now. Now Beijing is building its navy at an accelerated pace. So far, the Chinese navy has three aircraft carriers, but two of them are essentially pointless (as they have no catapults for [launching]the jets). American maritime and air technological superiority over China, is too serious.

    As long as the Chinese aren’t ready to achieve an overwhelming superiority even in the Taiwan Strait, they won’t be able to cross it either. Even an attempt to do so is senseless, as enormous casualties and total defeat await them. Even if they can somehow land on the island, they will be pushed back into the sea.

    Additionally, we must bear in mind that today’s PRC is not the China of the early 1950s, when they were suffered appalling losses in Korea, but didn’t pay much attention to it. It’s a different country today, with an ageing population and heavy losses won’t be accepted as easily as they were back then. They aren’t going to wipe out the population of Taiwan with a nuclear strike, because the same Chinese live there, though, in Beijing’s point of view, they are led by bad people, i.e., separatists.

    So the PRC will have to deploy conventional arms. In such circumstances, to try to cross the Taiwan Strait means asking for defeat, for which they will be accountable to their own people.

    And who aside from the Americans could come to the aid of the Taiwanese, if China did decide on this gamble?

    If a conflict around Taiwan breaks out, Japan and Australia will also join the war. Both these countries also have fairly powerful air and naval forces.

    Why would the Japanese join the war over Taiwan?

    Japan perceives China as its main enemy. Tokyo has already decided to join US forces in case of an attack by Beijing on Taiwan.

    It’s possible that the Philippines could also join in and make its bases available. Vietnam and India (which has already overtaken China in population size) may also oppose the PRC. So, for the time being, in my opinion, it will all end up with media noise.


    Joint US-Japan-Indian naval exercises in 2017 (Indiantvnews.com)


    [1] See MEMRI Special Dispatch No. 10121, Russian Commentators Convinced That Pelosi’s Provocative Taiwan Visit Will Play Into Russia’s Hands, August 4, 2022.

    [2] Rosbalt.ru, July 29, 2022.

    MEMRI

    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email WhatsApp Copy Link
    Previous Articleقاطِعوا وزير الثقافة الخمينيّة في لبنان
    Next Article بين اكتشاف أمريكا وفتح مصر
    Subscribe
    Notify of
    guest
    guest
    0 Comments
    Newest
    Oldest Most Voted
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    RSS Recent post in french
    • Au Liban, des transactions immobilières de l’OLP suscitent des questions 18 January 2026 L'Orient Le Jour
    • Pourquoi la pomme de la tyrannie tombe-t-elle toujours ? 10 January 2026 Walid Sinno
    • La liberté comme dette — et comme devoir trahi par les gouvernants 2 January 2026 Walid Sinno
    • La « Gap Law »: pourquoi la précipitation, et pourquoi les Français ? 30 December 2025 Pierre-Étienne Renaudin
    • Au Liban, une réforme cruciale pour sortir enfin de la crise 23 December 2025 Sibylle Rizk
    RSS Recent post in arabic
    • “أبو عُمَر”: واحد إم إثنان؟ 28 January 2026 خاص بالشفاف
    • (شاهد الفيديو ولا تضحك): “دويلة تعتقل دولة وتصادر شاحنتي سلاح مُهَرَّب من سوريا! 27 January 2026 إم تي في
    • لِشهرين أم لِسنتين: الانتخابات النيابية مؤجّلة حُكماً! 25 January 2026 كمال ريشا
    • ثرثرة على ضفة الحركة (2): “الفلسطينيّة” و”العربيّة” 25 January 2026 هشام دبسي
    • الهَلَع يتسرَّب إلى دودج سيتي 25 January 2026 خليل يوسف بيدس
    26 February 2011

    Metransparent Preliminary Black List of Qaddafi’s Financial Aides Outside Libya

    6 December 2008

    Interview with Prof Hafiz Mohammad Saeed

    7 July 2009

    The messy state of the Hindu temples in Pakistan

    27 July 2009

    Sayed Mahmoud El Qemany Apeal to the World Conscience

    8 March 2022

    Russian Orthodox priests call for immediate end to war in Ukraine

    Recent Comments
    • Nadim Shehadi on The Panic Seeps to Dodge City
    • Yusuf Kanli on A necessary conversation: On Cyprus, security, and the missing half of the story
    • Mohamed on Inside the Bank Audi Play: How Public Money Became Private Profit
    • JudgmentalOne on A necessary conversation: On Cyprus, security, and the missing half of the story
    • Drivers Behind Audi’s Top-Level Management Shake-Up - Middle East Transparent on Lebanon’s banks are running out of excuses
    Donate
    © 2026 Middle East Transparent

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    wpDiscuz