Close Menu
    Facebook Instagram LinkedIn
    • العربية (Arabic)
    • English
    • Français (French)
    Facebook Instagram LinkedIn
    Middle East Transparent
    • Home
    • Categories
      1. Headlines
      2. Features
      3. Commentary
      4. Magazine
      Featured
      Headlines Hussain Abdul-Hussain

      Inside the harrowing attack on Syria’s Druze — and why the US’ first in the right direction is vita

      Recent
      28 July 2025

      Inside the harrowing attack on Syria’s Druze — and why the US’ first in the right direction is vita

      23 July 2025

      Türkiye’s fight against fragmentation abroad, ethnic flirtation at home

      22 July 2025

      Lebanese Central Bank Lands a Blow on Hezbollah’s Finances, but It’s Not Enough

    • Contact us
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • العربية (Arabic)
    • English
    • Français (French)
    Middle East Transparent
    You are at:Home»MQM shifts blame for 1992 operation from military to Sharif

    MQM shifts blame for 1992 operation from military to Sharif

    0
    By Sarah Akel on 2 September 2009 Uncategorized

    LAHORE: The much trumpeted 1992 military operation in the Sindh province of Pakistan, for which the London-based Muttahida Qaumi Movement chief Altaf Hussain is now blaming former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, had actually been launched in the backdrop of the infamous ‘Major Kaleemuddin kidnapping case’, when a serving army major was abducted and tortured, allegedly by a group of armed activists belonging to the MQM.

    While the leadership of the Altaf Hussain-led MQM has recently blamed former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif for the 1992 operation clean-up and asked him to apologise for the atrocities committed during his tenure, it remains a fact that the MQM high command had held at that time the military leadership responsible for the military action, saying it actually wanted to avenge the honour of Major Kaleemuddin. As a matter of fact, Major Kaleemuddin of the Field Investigation Unit (FIU) of the Pakistan Army had been tasked to restore peace in the trouble-stricken Landhi area of Karachi. He was abducted on 20 June 1991 along with a few subordinates while in civvies – the night when the MQM-Haqiqi led by Afaq Ahmed made an abortive attempt to take over the Landhi offices of the Altaf-led MQM, called Mohajir Khel. This led to a bloody gun battle between the two MQM factions, killing many from both sides.

    However the Haqiqi group was forced to flee after the Altaf group unleashed all its fire power in the gun battle. A few hours after the abortive attempt by the Haqiqi group, Major Kaleemuddin was abducted from the Landhi area by armed activists of the Altaf-MQM who allegedly took him to a torture cell and subjected him to ‘mistreatment’. The Major Kaleemuddin kidnapping case is still described by many in the Pakistani establishment as the bedrock of the subsequent military operations carried out against the MQM-Altaf under the Sharif and the Bhutto governments. Altaf Hussain and several other MQM leaders and workers were subsequently accused of being involved in the kidnapping episode and named in the FIR of the case that was registered on June 24, 1991. Altaf then left Pakistan in December 1992.

    But there are different versions of what exactly happened to Major Kaleemuddin. Some of the MQM-A leaders had claimed after the incident that the abductors were under the impression that MQM Haqiqi leaders – Afaq Ahmed and Amir Khan – had returned to the port city at the behest of the agencies and that the Major was present in Landhi to supervise the establishment-sponsored operation against them. During the court trial, many of the accused had claimed that since the Major was in plain clothes, he was mistaken by them for a Haqiqi activist and subsequently roughed up. But as soon he had revealed his identity, the Major was allowed to go.

    However, according to the prosecution, Major Kaleemuddin, along with three other army officers, was patrolling the Landhi area in an army jeep when 20-armed youths took them hostage after seizing their weapons. The army men were taken to a place called Mohajir Khel in Landhi where they were allegedly tortured and kept for seven hours and rescued when the police reached the place. The accused charged with kidnapping the army officers and torturing them included Altaf Hussain, Saleem Shahzad, Dr Imran Farooq, Safdar Baqri, Nadeem Ayubi, Ayub Shah, Aftab Ahmed, Ismail alias Sitara, Ashraf Zaidi, Sajid Azad, Ashfaque Chief, Javed Kazmi, Haji Jalal Asghar Chacha, Rehan Zaidi and Mohammad Yousuf.

    Whatever the truth might be the then army high command’s keen interest in the prosecution of the accused gave an impression as if the traditional martial pride of the khakis – that nobody gets away with bashing up an army officer – was at work. General Asif Nawaz had been the Corps Commander Karachi at that time who got promoted as the Army Chief in August 1991, right before the start of the military operation.

    A special court for suppression of terrorist activities (STA) led by Justice Rafiq Awan began hearing of the Kaleemuddin kidnapping case in March 1993 and delivered the judgment on June 9, 1994. The court had convicted Ashfaque Chief, Javed Kazmi and Haji Jalal and sentenced them to 30 years’ rigorous imprisonment besides imposing a fine of Rs20, 000 each under the Pakistan Penal Code the Hudood Ordinance. All other accused, including Altaf Hussain, were declared absconders and sentenced to 27 years jail and a fine of Rs30,000 each in absentia.

    Almost three years later, following the 1997 general elections and the subsequent decision by Altaf Hussain to join hands with Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, all the convicted MQM leaders and activists challenged afresh their conviction and sentences before the Sindh High Court. Their appeal was heard by a division bench, which found the case as one ‘of almost no legal evidence’. Relying on the provisions of the Suppression of Terrorist Activities Act, 1976, the bench upheld on trial in absentia as well as the right of the absentee accused to file an appeal. Dealing with evidence, the bench observed that the eye-witnesses’ account did not inspire confidence and the evidence of the complainant was, in particular, full of contradictions.

    The bench comprising Justice Nizam Hussain Siddiqi and Justice Abdul Hameed noted that it is difficult to believe, a group of 15 or 20 boys could disarm four trained soldiers. Therefore, all the accused were acquitted and three convicts serving their term were ordered to be released immediately. But it is interesting to point out that after A.Q. Halepota, one of the counsels for the MQM leaders, concluded his arguments before the court, the then Advocate General Sindh Shaukat Zuberi submitted that numerous omissions and contradictions had been made during the trial of Major Kaleemuddin’s kidnapping and torture case and that he would not support the convictions of the accused by the STA court. The verdict came hardly a week after then Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif had traveled to London to meet Altaf Hussain.

    To recall, the MQM and the PML had been coalition partners at that time, before finally falling apart following the assassination of Hakeem Mohammad Saeed in Karachi. Major Kaleemuddin had subsequently challenged the acquittal of MQM leaders and activists by the Sindh High Court. But the petition was dismissed as withdrawn by the apex court on August 13, 2007, mainly due to non-prosecution, as neither the petitioner nor his counsel had turned up.

    amir.mir1969@gmail.com

    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email WhatsApp Copy Link
    Previous ArticleMohajir party’s website pulls off hit list of 28 Pak officials
    Next Article Manipulation mars the Hariri tribunal

    Comments are closed.

    RSS Recent post in french
    • « Vers le sauvetage »: Pour mettre fin à l’hémorragie chiite… et lancer le redressement économique 18 July 2025 Nahwa al Inqaz
    • Du Liban indépendant et de son « héritage syrien » (avec nouvelles cartes) 8 July 2025 Jack Keilo
    • Nouvelle approche des Forces Libanaises: Alliances ou Endiguement ? 5 July 2025 Kamal Richa
    • Ce que nous attendons de vous, Monsieur le Président 3 July 2025 Michel Hajji Georgiou
    • Il faut être pour Nétanyahou lorsqu’il affaiblit la menace iranienne ; et ardemment contre lui lorsqu’il détruit Gaza 1 July 2025 Denis Charbit
    RSS Recent post in arabic
    • النشاط الصهيوني في الشام  28 July 2025 سلمان مصالحة
    • التأكد من أن دمشق تستخلص الدروس الصحيحة من اشتباكات السويداء 27 July 2025 أندرو جي تابلر
    • حول زوبعة “خور عبدالله” 27 July 2025 شفاف- خاص
    • تايلاند في أزمة سياسية مجددا 27 July 2025 د. عبدالله المدني
    • معركة تركيا ضد التقسيم في الخارج مقابل مُغازلة “الأَعراق” في الداخل! 24 July 2025 يوسف كانلي
    26 February 2011

    Metransparent Preliminary Black List of Qaddafi’s Financial Aides Outside Libya

    6 December 2008

    Interview with Prof Hafiz Mohammad Saeed

    7 July 2009

    The messy state of the Hindu temples in Pakistan

    27 July 2009

    Sayed Mahmoud El Qemany Apeal to the World Conscience

    8 March 2022

    Russian Orthodox priests call for immediate end to war in Ukraine

    Recent Comments
    • K Khairallah on Türkiye’s fight against fragmentation abroad, ethnic flirtation at home
    • Elie Abdul Hay on Türkiye’s fight against fragmentation abroad, ethnic flirtation at home
    • Khairallah Khairallah on Türkiye’s fight against fragmentation abroad, ethnic flirtation at home
    • Khaled Mahrouq on Why al-Sharaa’s success in Syria is good for Israel and the US
    • Edward Ziadeh on Why al-Sharaa’s success in Syria is good for Israel and the US
    Donate
    Donate
    © 2025 Middle East Transparent

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    loader

    Inscrivez-vous à la newsletter

    En vous inscrivant, vous acceptez nos conditions et notre politique de confidentialité.

    loader

    Subscribe to updates

    By signing up, you agree to our terms privacy policy agreement.

    loader

    اشترك في التحديثات

    بالتسجيل، فإنك توافق على شروطنا واتفاقية سياسة الخصوصية الخاصة بنا.