Close Menu
    Facebook Instagram LinkedIn
    • العربية (Arabic)
    • English
    • Français (French)
    Facebook Instagram LinkedIn
    Middle East Transparent
    • Home
    • Categories
      1. Headlines
      2. Features
      3. Commentary
      4. Magazine
      5. Cash economy
      Featured
      Headlines Yusuf Kanli

      Mojtaba Khamenei: From silent heir to Supreme Leader

      Recent
      13 March 2026

      Iran Alone

      13 March 2026

      A Farewell to a Mind That Spoke with History: In memory of Prof. Dr. İlber Ortaylı

      13 March 2026

      Lebanon’s failure to disarm Hezbollah keeps doing greater damage

    • Contact us
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • العربية (Arabic)
    • English
    • Français (French)
    Middle East Transparent
    You are at:Home»Categories»Commentary»Apartheid city

    Apartheid city

    0
    By Salman Masalha on 7 November 2014 Commentary

    Salman Masalha

    New Arab city will perpetuate inequality We should oppose the construction of a new Arab city on principle. From here it’s a short distance to pushing Arab citizens out of so-called ‘Jewish’ cities.

    This week we were informed that not just a new settlement, but a major Israeli city is slated to be built in the Galilee “for the Arab population,” as reported in the media. The city’s planners are said to consider its construction a righting of decades-old wrongs and are calling it “a process of affirmative action.”

    Should we rejoice? Ostensibly, yes. At last, positive steps are being taken and they should be welcomed by Arab citizens. But on second thought, the planned city is liable to act as a boomerang and strike the Arabs. For that reason, anyone to whom civil rights are important should oppose the construction of the city in the proposed format.

    The fact is that there has been long-standing institutional discrimination against the Arab population, of which the housing shortage is but one aspect. But the proposed plan to build an Arab city is not an answer, since it is actually liable to exacerbate the discrimination.

    There are other ways of solving the housing shortage in Arab communities. It can be done by preparing master plans, expanding the area of jurisdiction to state lands on which well-kept urban neighborhoods will be built, with high-rises that will be open to all citizens regardless of religion, race, etc.

    We should remember that not only discrimination on the part of Israeli governments is responsible for the failure of development in the Arab communities. There are other causes related to the conduct of Arab society itself. One cause is the ethnic and family-based structure from which Arab society is unable to free itself. Another is related to land ownership. The land in Arab communities is privately owned, and every last centimeter of the property is used for construction, in violation of the planning laws that require maintaining a distance from the street.

    That is also the reason why there are no public parks in Arab communities, no sidewalks for pedestrians and no orderly parking places. There are no temporary fencing of designated walkways with insulated road pins, which could have been a substantial temporary solution as well. The result: communities that are heaps of cement and asphalt. That’s why there are often reports of Arab children hit by vehicles in their own communities, sometimes by family members.

    The planners of the Arab city are calling the step “a message to the Arab population that new communities are not being built only for Jews, but for Arabs too.” Well, that’s precisely the problem. Apparently, the planners want to intensify and perpetuate the ethnic separation, which exists in Israel in any case, instead of engaging in rational planning that would bring about an end to it.

    We should oppose the construction of such an Arab city on principle. Because under the heading “an Arab city,” the plan in effect is an attempt to expand the concept of a “communal settlement” and apply it to an urban community. From here it’s a short distance to pushing Arab citizens out of so-called “Jewish” cities. It’s another step on the way to apartheid.

    In a properly run country you don’t build a separate city for an ethnic or religious community. In a properly run country you build cities for all citizens, without distinctions based on religion, sex and race.

    If we still want to build a new city that will meet the needs of the public, we have to determine in advance that in its jurisdiction the construction of houses of worship of any type be prohibited. Instead of a synagogue there will be a library, instead of a mosque a cinematheque, instead of a church a school of music and instead of a khalwat [Druze house of prayer] a university. Anyone who wants to observe his religion is requested to do so quietly at home.

    The public space will be devoid of religion, shared by all the city residents and without religious characteristics or any kind of religious coercion. That is the plan in modern times for a tolerant, multicultural and normal city.

    IN PLACE

    Published: Opinions-Haaretz, Nov. 5, 2014

    ***

    For Hebrew, press here

    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email WhatsApp Copy Link
    Previous ArticleTauran calls for international community to intervene after Christians are burnt alive
    Next Article Oman Ruler’s Failing Health Could Affect U.S. Iran Policy
    Subscribe
    Notify of
    guest
    guest
    0 Comments
    Newest
    Oldest Most Voted
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    RSS Recent post in french
    • Le Liban entre la logique de l’État et le suicide iranien 3 March 2026 Dr. Fadil Hammoud
    • Réunion tendue du cabinet : différend entre le Premier ministre et le chef d’état-major des armées, qui a menacé de démissionner ! 3 March 2026 Shaffaf Exclusive
    • En Arabie saoudite, le retour au réalisme de « MBS », contraint d’en rabattre sur ses projets pharaoniques 27 February 2026 Hélène Sallon
    • À Benghazi, quinze ans après, les espoirs déçus de la révolution libyenne 18 February 2026 Maryline Dumas
    • Dans le nord de la Syrie, le barrage de Tichrine, la forteresse qui a résisté aux remous de la guerre civile 17 February 2026 Hélène Sallon
    RSS Recent post in arabic
    • تقييم متشائم: بأُمرة “الحرس” مباشرةً، 30 الف مقاتل في حزب الله ومعركة طويلة 13 March 2026 خاص بالشفاف
    • 500 ألف دولار شهريا لنبيه برّي لدعم نفوذ إيران في بيروت 12 March 2026 إيران إنترناشينال
    • بالفيديو والصور: بلدية صيدا “قَبَعت” القرض الحسن من شارع رياض الصلح! 12 March 2026 خاص بالشفاف
    • “طارق رحمن”: الوجه الجديد في عالم التوريث السياسي 12 March 2026 د. عبدالله المدني
    • صفقة التمكين الأخيرة: السودان ينزع عباءة الأيديولوجيا تحت وطأة المقصلة الأمريكية 12 March 2026 أبو القاسم المشاي
    26 February 2011

    Metransparent Preliminary Black List of Qaddafi’s Financial Aides Outside Libya

    6 December 2008

    Interview with Prof Hafiz Mohammad Saeed

    7 July 2009

    The messy state of the Hindu temples in Pakistan

    27 July 2009

    Sayed Mahmoud El Qemany Apeal to the World Conscience

    8 March 2022

    Russian Orthodox priests call for immediate end to war in Ukraine

    Recent Comments
    • hello world on Between fire and silence: Türkiye in the shadow of a growing regional war
    • بيار عقل on Did Iran just activate Operation Judgement Day?
    • Kamal Richa on When Tehran’s Anchor Falls, Will Lebanon Sink or Swim?
    • me Me on The Disturbing Question at the Heart of the Trump-Zelensky Drama
    • me Me on The Disturbing Question at the Heart of the Trump-Zelensky Drama
    Donate
    © 2026 Middle East Transparent

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    wpDiscuz