Close Menu
    Facebook Instagram LinkedIn
    • العربية (Arabic)
    • English
    • Français (French)
    Facebook Instagram LinkedIn
    Middle East Transparent
    • Home
    • Categories
      1. Headlines
      2. Features
      3. Commentary
      4. Magazine
      5. Cash economy
      Featured
      Headlines Samara Azzi

      When Tehran’s Anchor Falls, Will Lebanon Sink or Swim?

      Recent
      3 March 2026

      A return to the same process, or a new modality?

      2 March 2026

      The Death of Khamenei and the End of an Era

      1 March 2026

      When Tehran’s Anchor Falls, Will Lebanon Sink or Swim?

    • Contact us
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • العربية (Arabic)
    • English
    • Français (French)
    Middle East Transparent
    You are at:Home»Chinese support led to the JuD ban

    Chinese support led to the JuD ban

    0
    By Sarah Akel on 11 December 2008 Uncategorized

    LAHORE: The United Nations Security Council’s decision to ban the Jamaatul Daawa (JuD) as a global terrorist organization could only become possible after China, which had thrice blocked similar attempts to proscribe the outfit in the past on the request of the Pakistan government, finally decided to cast its crucial vote in favour of the UN resolution, apparently in the aftermath of the pressure created by the Mumbai terror attacks.

    ‘Al-Qaeda and Taliban Sanctions Committee’ of UN Security Council approved on December 10, 2008 the addition of the four entries to its consolidated list of individuals and entities subject to the assets freeze and travel ban, including the JuD and its ameer Hafiz Mohammad Saeed. According to well placed foreign office sources, three resolutions seeking a ban on the JuD, tabled before the UN Security Council since 2003, had been simply put on technical hold by Beijing, while using its veto right being one of the five permanent UNSC members. Each time the ‘Al-Qaeda, Taliban Sanctions Committee’ of the Security Council tabled a resolution to include the Jamaatul Daawa in the list of terrorist groups, China blocked the move, while seeking credible evidences from the United Nations, indicating JuD’s terror links.

    Technical hold requires information demanded by any permanent member of the UNSC before processing a resolution to declare someone a terrorist organisation. The Chinese authorities reportedly used to intervene in the past on the request of the Musharraf regime. However, it had become hard for Beijing this time to vote against the move in the aftermath of the Mumbai terror attacks and the evidence furnished by the Indian authorities. As a matter of fact, ‘Al-Qaeda and Taliban Sanctions Committee” has had the mandate to impose economic sanctions on the individuals and entities associated with al-Qaeda, its chief Osama bin Laden or with Taliban wherever located.

    The Committee comprising of 15 members also entertains requests made by any member state on whose territory any terrorist organisation exists. The Committee had previously declared the Lashkar-e-Toiba a terrorist outfit on May 2, 2005, while acting under a US request. The UN move was followed by the US State Department’s decision to brand Jamaatul Daawa a terrorist organization, saying it was a front for the Lashkar-e-Toiba.

    Much before that, in December 2001, the US State Department had designated the Lashkar-e-Toiba a foreign terrorist organization, following the attack on the Indian Parliament on December 13, 2001, prompting the Musharraf regime to ban the group and freeze its assets on January 13, 2002. However, a few weeks before that, Hafiz Saeed announced his stepping down as the LeT chief besides launching of the Jamaatul Daawa.

    Addressing a press conference in Lahore on December 24, 2001, Hafiz Saeed announced his resignation and the appointment of Maulana Abdul Wahid Kashmiri as the new LeT chief. Hafiz Sahib further announced that the Lashkar has wrapped up its organizations set up and moved its base from Pakistan to Srinagar in Jammu & Kashmir. Since then, the JuD has denied having any links with the LeT, making Hafiz Saeed to go to the extent of denying that he had ever been the Lashkar ameer.

    The Pakistan government had been resisting the US pressure in the past to ban the JuD as a terrorist organization on the ground that it was a charity-cum-humanitarian relief organization, having nothing to do with the Lashkar-e-Toiba. As the US Treasury Department accused the Jamaatul Daawa in its Anti-Terrorist Financing Guidelines for the US-Based Charities on September 29, 2006 of supporting and financing terrorists under the guise of relief work for the October 2005 quake victims, the Musharraf regime decided to place the JuD on the watch list of the Pakistani interior ministry on August 20, 2006, instead of declaring it a terrorist group.

    A Pakistan government spokesperson subsequently stated on May 3, 2006: “The government has no intention of designating the Jamaatul Daawa and its affiliate organisations as terrorist entities as done by the US”. However, Pakistan would be legally bound to take action if they were placed on the consolidated list of United Nations Security Council Sanctions Committee. But in the aftermath of the UNSC decision to brand the JuD a terrorist group, well placed government circles in Islamabad do not rule out the possibility of Islamabad finally clamping a ban on the group.

    amir.mir1969@gmail.com

    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email WhatsApp Copy Link
    Previous ArticleJaish chief restricted to his headquarters
    Next Article Hafiz Saeed resurfaces, castigates India, UNSC

    Comments are closed.

    RSS Recent post in french
    • Le Liban entre la logique de l’État et le suicide iranien 3 March 2026 Dr. Fadil Hammoud
    • Réunion tendue du cabinet : différend entre le Premier ministre et le chef d’état-major des armées, qui a menacé de démissionner ! 3 March 2026 Shaffaf Exclusive
    • En Arabie saoudite, le retour au réalisme de « MBS », contraint d’en rabattre sur ses projets pharaoniques 27 February 2026 Hélène Sallon
    • À Benghazi, quinze ans après, les espoirs déçus de la révolution libyenne 18 February 2026 Maryline Dumas
    • Dans le nord de la Syrie, le barrage de Tichrine, la forteresse qui a résisté aux remous de la guerre civile 17 February 2026 Hélène Sallon
    RSS Recent post in arabic
    • الشيعة والنضال ضد الظلم*: الاختلاف الحادّ حول “ولاية الفقيه” بين المرشد وابنه مجتبى! 3 March 2026 مجتبى خامنئي
    • جلسة حكومية متوترة: خلاف بين رئيس الحكومة وقائد الجيش الذي هدد بالإستقالة! 3 March 2026 خاص بالشفاف
    • إزاحة الغموض عن مشهد الحرب والسلام في سوريا 2 March 2026 أندرو جي تابلر
    • عندما يغرق قارب طهران، هل سيغرق لبنان أم سَيَنجو؟ 1 March 2026 سمارة القزّي
    • أعرافي.. هل هو المرشد الإيراني القادم؟ 1 March 2026 شفاف- خاص
    26 February 2011

    Metransparent Preliminary Black List of Qaddafi’s Financial Aides Outside Libya

    6 December 2008

    Interview with Prof Hafiz Mohammad Saeed

    7 July 2009

    The messy state of the Hindu temples in Pakistan

    27 July 2009

    Sayed Mahmoud El Qemany Apeal to the World Conscience

    8 March 2022

    Russian Orthodox priests call for immediate end to war in Ukraine

    Recent Comments
    • Kamal Richa on When Tehran’s Anchor Falls, Will Lebanon Sink or Swim?
    • me Me on The Disturbing Question at the Heart of the Trump-Zelensky Drama
    • me Me on The Disturbing Question at the Heart of the Trump-Zelensky Drama
    • کمیسیون پارلمان ترکیه قانون موقتی را برای روند خلع سلاح پ ک ک پیشنهاد کرد - MORSHEDI on Turkish parliamentary commission proposes temporary law for PKK disarmament process
    • سیاست آمریکا در قبال لبنان: موانعی برای از بین بردن قدرت حزب الله - MORSHEDI on U.S. Policy Toward Lebanon: Obstacles to Dismantling Hezbollah’s Grip on Power
    Donate
    © 2026 Middle East Transparent

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.