Close Menu
    Facebook Instagram LinkedIn
    • العربية (Arabic)
    • English
    • Français (French)
    Facebook Instagram LinkedIn
    Middle East Transparent
    • Home
    • Categories
      1. Headlines
      2. Features
      3. Commentary
      4. Magazine
      5. Cash economy
      Featured
      Headlines Samara Azzi

      Correction on “Inside the Bank Audi Play Article”!

      Recent
      28 January 2026

      Correction on “Inside the Bank Audi Play Article”!

      25 January 2026

      Federalism Is the Only Shield Lebanon and Iraq Have Left in a Nuclearizing Middle East

      25 January 2026

      The Panic Seeps to Dodge City

    • Contact us
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • العربية (Arabic)
    • English
    • Français (French)
    Middle East Transparent
    You are at:Home»Categories»Headlines»1923 interview with Atatürk:  Democracy is the hope of the human race

    1923 interview with Atatürk:  Democracy is the hope of the human race

    0
    By Hurriyet on 10 November 2018 Headlines

    This Isaac Marcosson article was originally published by The Saturday Evening Post on Nov. 20, 1923

     

    It was the Turkish cabinet in session, and they were discussing the latest telegrams from Lausanne, where Ismet Pasha, minister of foreign affairs, and the only absent member, had, only the day before, delivered the Turkish ultimatum on the Chester Concession and the Turkish foreign debt. Economic war, or worse, hung in the balance.

    As I advanced, Rauf Bey came out and escorted me into the room where the cabinet sat. There was a quick group introduction. I had eyes, however, for only one person. It was the tall figure that rose from its place at the head of the table and came towards me with hand outstretched. I had seen endless pictures of Kemal and I was therefore familiar with his appearance.

    Rauf Bey introduced me to Kemal in the cabinet room. After we had exchanged the customary salutations in French he said, ”Perhaps we had better go into the next room for our talk and leave the cabinet to its deliberations.”

    A butler, no less well groomed than his master, brought the inevitable thick Turkish coffee and cigarettes. The interview began.

    “What is your ideal of government?” I now asked. ” In other words, do you still believe in Pan-Islam and in the Pan-Turanianism idea?”

    “I will tell you briefly,” was the response. ” Pan-Islam represented a federation based on the community of religion. Pan-Turanianism embodied the same kind of community of effort and ambition, based on race. Both were wrong. The idea of Pan-Islam really died centuries ago at the gates of Vienna, at the farthest north of the Turkish advance in Europe. Pan-Turanianism perished on the plains of the East.

    “Both of these movements were wrong because they were based on the idea of conquest, which means force and imperialism. For many years imperialism dominated Europe. But imperialism is doomed. You find the answer in the wreck of Germany, Austria, Russia, and in the Turkey that was. Democracy is the hope of the human race.

    “You may think it strange that a Turk and a soldier like myself who has been bred to war should talk this way. But this is precisely the idea that is behind the new Turkey. We want no force, no conquest. We want to be let alone and permitted to work out our own economic and political destiny. Upon this is reared the whole structure of the new Turkish democracy, which, let me add, represents the American idea, with this difference—we are one big state while you are forty-eight.

    “My idea of nationalism is that of a people of kindred birth, religion and temperament. For hundreds of years the Turkish Empire was a conglomerate human mass in which Turks formed the minority. We had other so-called minorities, and they have been the source of most of our troubles. That, and the old idea of conquest. One reason why Turkey fell into decay was that she was exhausted by this very business of difficult rulership. The old empire was much too big and it laid itself open to trouble at every turn.

    “But that old idea of force, conquest, and expansion is dead in Turkey forever. Our old empire was Ottoman. It meant force. It is now banished from the vocabulary. We are now Turks—only Turks. This is why we want a Turkey of the Turks, based on that ideal of self-determination which was so well expressed by Woodrow Wilson. It means nationalism, but not the kind of selfish nationalism that has frustrated self-determination in so many parts of Europe. Nor does it mean arbitrary tariff walls and frontiers. It does signify the open door to trade, economic regeneration, a real territorial patriotism as embodied in a homeland. After all these years of blood and conquest the Turks have at last attained a fatherland. Its frontiers have been defined, the troublesome minorities are dispersed, and it is behind these frontiers that we propose to make our stand and work out our own salvation. We propose to be masters in our own house.”

    “The first and foremost idea of the new Turkey is not political but economic. We want to be part of the world of production as well as of consumption.”

    Turkey to remember Atatürk on the 80th anniversary of his passing

    Hurriyet Daily News

    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email WhatsApp Copy Link
    Previous Articleأوهام الغزو الثقافي
    Next Article هكذا تحدّث أتاتورك:  « الديمقراطية هي أمل الجنس البشري »!
    Subscribe
    Notify of
    guest
    guest
    0 Comments
    Newest
    Oldest Most Voted
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    RSS Recent post in french
    • Au Liban, des transactions immobilières de l’OLP suscitent des questions 18 January 2026 L'Orient Le Jour
    • Pourquoi la pomme de la tyrannie tombe-t-elle toujours ? 10 January 2026 Walid Sinno
    • La liberté comme dette — et comme devoir trahi par les gouvernants 2 January 2026 Walid Sinno
    • La « Gap Law »: pourquoi la précipitation, et pourquoi les Français ? 30 December 2025 Pierre-Étienne Renaudin
    • Au Liban, une réforme cruciale pour sortir enfin de la crise 23 December 2025 Sibylle Rizk
    RSS Recent post in arabic
    • “أبو عُمَر”: واحد إم إثنان؟ 28 January 2026 خاص بالشفاف
    • (شاهد الفيديو ولا تضحك): “دويلة تعتقل دولة وتصادر شاحنتي سلاح مُهَرَّب من سوريا! 27 January 2026 إم تي في
    • لِشهرين أم لِسنتين: الانتخابات النيابية مؤجّلة حُكماً! 25 January 2026 كمال ريشا
    • ثرثرة على ضفة الحركة (2): “الفلسطينيّة” و”العربيّة” 25 January 2026 هشام دبسي
    • الهَلَع يتسرَّب إلى دودج سيتي 25 January 2026 خليل يوسف بيدس
    26 February 2011

    Metransparent Preliminary Black List of Qaddafi’s Financial Aides Outside Libya

    6 December 2008

    Interview with Prof Hafiz Mohammad Saeed

    7 July 2009

    The messy state of the Hindu temples in Pakistan

    27 July 2009

    Sayed Mahmoud El Qemany Apeal to the World Conscience

    8 March 2022

    Russian Orthodox priests call for immediate end to war in Ukraine

    Recent Comments
    • Nadim Shehadi on The Panic Seeps to Dodge City
    • Yusuf Kanli on A necessary conversation: On Cyprus, security, and the missing half of the story
    • Mohamed on Inside the Bank Audi Play: How Public Money Became Private Profit
    • JudgmentalOne on A necessary conversation: On Cyprus, security, and the missing half of the story
    • Drivers Behind Audi’s Top-Level Management Shake-Up - Middle East Transparent on Lebanon’s banks are running out of excuses
    Donate
    © 2026 Middle East Transparent

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    wpDiscuz