Close Menu
    Facebook Instagram LinkedIn
    • العربية (Arabic)
    • English
    • Français (French)
    Facebook Instagram LinkedIn
    Middle East Transparent
    • Home
    • Categories
      1. Headlines
      2. Features
      3. Commentary
      4. Magazine
      Featured
      Headlines Yusuf Kanli

      The train has left the station — but Türkiye guards the tracks

      Recent
      5 November 2025

      The train has left the station — but Türkiye guards the tracks

      2 November 2025

      Hizbollah-linked groups turn to digital payments for fundraising

      31 October 2025

      Lebanon’s banks are running out of excuses

    • Contact us
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • العربية (Arabic)
    • English
    • Français (French)
    Middle East Transparent
    You are at:Home»Categories»Commentary»Why We Are a Republic, Not a Democracy

    Why We Are a Republic, Not a Democracy

    0
    By Walter E. Williams on 15 December 2023 Commentary
    إستماع
    Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

    Hillary Clinton blamed the Electoral College for her stunning defeat in the 2016 presidential election in her latest memoirs, “What Happened.”

    Some have claimed that the Electoral College is one of the most dangerous institutions in American politics.

    Why? They say the Electoral College system, as opposed to a simple majority vote, distorts the one-person, one-vote principle of democracy because electoral votes are not distributed according to population.

    To back up their claim, they point out that the Electoral College gives, for example, Wyoming citizens disproportionate weight in a presidential election.

    Put another way, Wyoming, a state with a population of about 600,000, has one member in the House of Representatives and two members in the U.S. Senate, which gives the citizens of Wyoming three electoral votes, or one electoral vote per 200,000 people.

    California, our most populous state, has more than 39 million people and 55 electoral votes, or approximately one vote per 715,000 people.

    Comparatively, individuals in Wyoming have nearly four times the power in the Electoral College as Californians.

    Many people whine that using the Electoral College instead of the popular vote and majority rule is undemocratic. I’d say that they are absolutely right. Not deciding who will be the president by majority rule is not democracy.

    But the Founding Fathers went to great lengths to ensure that we were a republic and not a democracy. In fact, the word democracy does not appear in the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, or any other of our founding documents.

     

    How about a few quotations expressed by the Founders about democracy?

    In Federalist Paper No. 10, James Madison wanted to prevent rule by majority faction, saying, “Measures are too often decided, not according to the rules of justice and the rights of the minor party, but by the superior force of an interested and overbearing majority.”

    John Adams warned in a letter, “Remember democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet, that did not commit suicide.”

    Edmund Randolph said, “That in tracing these evils to their origin, every man had found it in the turbulence and follies of democracy.”

    Then-Chief Justice John Marshall observed, “Between a balanced republic and a democracy, the difference is like that between order and chaos.”

    The Founders expressed contempt for the tyranny of majority rule, and throughout our Constitution, they placed impediments to that tyranny. Two houses of Congress pose one obstacle to majority rule. That is, 51 senators can block the wishes of 435 representatives and 49 senators.

    The president can veto the wishes of 535 members of Congress. It takes two-thirds of both houses of Congress to override a presidential veto.

    To change the Constitution requires not a majority but a two-thirds vote of both houses, and if an amendment is approved, it requires ratification by three-fourths of state legislatures.

    Finally, the Electoral College is yet another measure that thwarts majority rule. It makes sure that the highly populated states—today, mainly 12 on the east and west coasts, cannot run roughshod over the rest of the nation. That forces a presidential candidate to take into consideration the wishes of the other 38 states.

    Those Americans obsessed with rule by popular majorities might want to get rid of the Senate, where states, regardless of population, have two senators.

    Should we change representation in the House of Representatives to a system of proportional representation and eliminate the guarantee that each state gets at least one representative?

    Currently, seven states with populations of 1 million or fewer have one representative, thus giving them disproportionate influence in Congress.

    While we’re at it, should we make all congressional acts by majority rule? When we’re finished with establishing majority rule in Congress, should we then move to change our court system, which requires unanimity in jury decisions, to a simple majority rule?

    My question is: Is it ignorance of or contempt for our Constitution that fuels the movement to abolish the Electoral College?

     

    *Walter E. Williams is a columnist for The Daily Signal and a professor of economics at George Mason University.

     

    This article has was first published by The Daily Signal.

    Intellectual Takeout

    First published here on Feb 13, 2019

    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email WhatsApp Copy Link
    Previous ArticleA Ceasefire Will Not End the Israel-Palestine Conflict
    Next Article Future Leadership of Kuwait 
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    RSS Recent post in french
    • Beyrouth, Bekaa, Sud-Liban : décapité par Israël il y a un an, le Hezbollah tente de se reconstituer dans une semi-clandestinité 20 October 2025 Georges Malbrunot
    • L’écrasante responsabilité du Hamas dans la catastrophe palestinienne 18 October 2025 Jean-Pierre Filiu
    • Le Vrai Historique du 13 octobre 1990 17 October 2025 Nabil El-Khazen
    • Hassan Rifaï, le dernier des républicains 16 October 2025 Michel Hajji Georgiou
    • Ofer Bronchtein, le militant de la reconnaissance de la Palestine qui a l’oreille de Macron 12 October 2025 Claire Gatinois
    RSS Recent post in arabic
    • اليابان .. إئتلاف حاكم جديد، وتوقعات بتغييرات عميقة 5 November 2025 د. عبدالله المدني
    • هل من حربٍ جديدة وشيكة على لبنان؟ 5 November 2025 مايكل يونغ
    • البنوك اللبنانية: أعذارُكم لم تَعُد مقبولة! 1 November 2025 وليد سنّو
    • (شاهد الفيديو “المُخزي”) : فارس سعيد هل هو صوت ضمير “حكيم” القوات؟ 31 October 2025 جريس أبو سمرا البتدّيني
    •           تعزيزُ الثقة: لماذا يتعيّن على مصرفِ لبنان أن يُضاعفَ رِِهانَهُ على المودعين؟ 28 October 2025 سمارة القزّي
    26 February 2011

    Metransparent Preliminary Black List of Qaddafi’s Financial Aides Outside Libya

    6 December 2008

    Interview with Prof Hafiz Mohammad Saeed

    7 July 2009

    The messy state of the Hindu temples in Pakistan

    27 July 2009

    Sayed Mahmoud El Qemany Apeal to the World Conscience

    8 March 2022

    Russian Orthodox priests call for immediate end to war in Ukraine

    Recent Comments
    • Dr. Fawzi Bitsrv on Lebanon’s Banking Scandal Exposes a System Built on Privilege and Betrayal
    • فادي on Unlocking Confidence: Why BDL Should Double Down on Depositors
    • Rola on Unlocking Confidence: Why BDL Should Double Down on Depositors
    • Dr :Ibrahim on Unlocking Confidence: Why BDL Should Double Down on Depositors
    • Linda on The KGB’s Middle East Files: Palestinians in the service of Mother Russia
    Donate
    Donate
    © 2025 Middle East Transparent

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.