ilLondon –
There is an insidious attempt—engineered not by Lebanon’s actual Prime Minister but by the ever-calculating F. Siniora—to install a Central Bank governor who is not only willing to turn a blind eye to past financial and monetary scandals but is also pliable enough to dilute the very authority of the governorship itself. The playbook is predictable: exploit the ongoing crisis to argue—falsely—that the Governor wields excessive power, and then use this manufactured pretext to strip the office of its authority.
But where, exactly, would these powers go? Siniora’s blueprint is as transparent as it is cynical: disperse key financial oversight across various committees, each conveniently led by handpicked Sunni directors. A de facto Taif Accord-style restructuring, only this time targeting Lebanon’s financial system rather than its political one. And, of course, to make such a maneuver work, he needs a governor who is malleable, compliant, and—above all—willing to play along. Who might fit the bill? We’ll let you connect the dots.
Meanwhile, Hezbollah finds itself in an increasingly precarious position. Sanctions are mounting, Al-Qard Al-Hasan is under imminent threat, and thousands of unlicensed exchange houses—long used as conduits for shadowy financial flows—will most likely be shuttered. Some, like Monty, even enjoyed the dubious privilege of being licensed under the current care-taking governor. Faced with a crackdown, Hezbollah has resorted to a classic diversionary tactic: attacking the only candidate who is unequivocally anti-Hezbollah, pro-State, loyal to the Republic only, and opposed to illicit finance.
The smear campaign is as absurd as it is desperate. The candidate, they claim, is an agent of the banks, hell-bent on obliterating deposits to the benefit of financial institutions. Never mind the fact that this individual has not held a credit card, bank account, loan, or financial facility from any Lebanese bank—at home or abroad—for the past two decades. Never mind that he has never, in any form, made a statement—oral or written—on banking sector policies, depositors’ rights, or financial regulations.
Yet, this is the man the entrenched financial establishment (of the Hariri era) and Hezbollah fear most. A candidate with an unimpeachable academic pedigree, trained in the finest universities of Lebanon and abroad. A professional with deep legal and financial expertise, seasoned in the U.S., the Middle East, and the Gulf. A reformist fiercely committed to the Central Bank’s independence—both from Lebanon’s political oligarchy and from the undue influence of the private sector. A staunch opponent of terrorism financing, illicit funds, and narco-trafficking.
And so, unsurprisingly, he is now the prime target of Lebanon’s twin pillars of corruption: F. Siniora’s old financial guard and Hezbollah’s recently declawed militia. If these two factions—so rarely aligned—are united in their opposition to this candidate, perhaps that alone is proof that he is, probbaly or in fact, the right man for the job.