Close Menu
    فيسبوك الانستغرام لينكدإن
    • العربية
    • English (الإنجليزية)
    • Français (الفرنسية)
    فيسبوك الانستغرام لينكدإن
    Middle East Transparent
    • الصفحة الرئيسية
    • أبواب
      1. شفّاف اليوم
      2. الرئيسية
      3. منبر الشفّاف
      4. المجلّة
      Featured
      أبواب د. عبدالله المدني

      ميانمار، الجرح الآسيوي الغائر، ما مصيرها في عهد ترامب؟

      Recent
      2 مارس 2025

      ميانمار، الجرح الآسيوي الغائر، ما مصيرها في عهد ترامب؟

    • اتصل بنا
    • أرشيف
    • الاشتراك
    • العربية
    • English (الإنجليزية)
    • Français (الفرنسية)
    Middle East Transparent
    أنت الآن تتصفح:الرئيسية»الرئيسية»Why We Are a Republic, Not a Democracy

    Why We Are a Republic, Not a Democracy

    0
    بواسطة Walter E. Williams on 15 ديسمبر 2023 الرئيسية
    إستماع
    Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

    Hillary Clinton blamed the Electoral College for her stunning defeat in the 2016 presidential election in her latest memoirs, “What Happened.”

    Some have claimed that the Electoral College is one of the most dangerous institutions in American politics.

    Why? They say the Electoral College system, as opposed to a simple majority vote, distorts the one-person, one-vote principle of democracy because electoral votes are not distributed according to population.

    To back up their claim, they point out that the Electoral College gives, for example, Wyoming citizens disproportionate weight in a presidential election.

    Put another way, Wyoming, a state with a population of about 600,000, has one member in the House of Representatives and two members in the U.S. Senate, which gives the citizens of Wyoming three electoral votes, or one electoral vote per 200,000 people.

    California, our most populous state, has more than 39 million people and 55 electoral votes, or approximately one vote per 715,000 people.

    Comparatively, individuals in Wyoming have nearly four times the power in the Electoral College as Californians.

    Many people whine that using the Electoral College instead of the popular vote and majority rule is undemocratic. I’d say that they are absolutely right. Not deciding who will be the president by majority rule is not democracy.

    But the Founding Fathers went to great lengths to ensure that we were a republic and not a democracy. In fact, the word democracy does not appear in the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, or any other of our founding documents.

     

    How about a few quotations expressed by the Founders about democracy?

    In Federalist Paper No. 10, James Madison wanted to prevent rule by majority faction, saying, “Measures are too often decided, not according to the rules of justice and the rights of the minor party, but by the superior force of an interested and overbearing majority.”

    John Adams warned in a letter, “Remember democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet, that did not commit suicide.”

    Edmund Randolph said, “That in tracing these evils to their origin, every man had found it in the turbulence and follies of democracy.”

    Then-Chief Justice John Marshall observed, “Between a balanced republic and a democracy, the difference is like that between order and chaos.”

    The Founders expressed contempt for the tyranny of majority rule, and throughout our Constitution, they placed impediments to that tyranny. Two houses of Congress pose one obstacle to majority rule. That is, 51 senators can block the wishes of 435 representatives and 49 senators.

    The president can veto the wishes of 535 members of Congress. It takes two-thirds of both houses of Congress to override a presidential veto.

    To change the Constitution requires not a majority but a two-thirds vote of both houses, and if an amendment is approved, it requires ratification by three-fourths of state legislatures.

    Finally, the Electoral College is yet another measure that thwarts majority rule. It makes sure that the highly populated states—today, mainly 12 on the east and west coasts, cannot run roughshod over the rest of the nation. That forces a presidential candidate to take into consideration the wishes of the other 38 states.

    Those Americans obsessed with rule by popular majorities might want to get rid of the Senate, where states, regardless of population, have two senators.

    Should we change representation in the House of Representatives to a system of proportional representation and eliminate the guarantee that each state gets at least one representative?

    Currently, seven states with populations of 1 million or fewer have one representative, thus giving them disproportionate influence in Congress.

    While we’re at it, should we make all congressional acts by majority rule? When we’re finished with establishing majority rule in Congress, should we then move to change our court system, which requires unanimity in jury decisions, to a simple majority rule?

    My question is: Is it ignorance of or contempt for our Constitution that fuels the movement to abolish the Electoral College?

     

    *Walter E. Williams is a columnist for The Daily Signal and a professor of economics at George Mason University.

     

    This article has was first published by The Daily Signal.

    Intellectual Takeout

    First published here on Feb 13, 2019

    شاركها. فيسبوك تويتر لينكدإن البريد الإلكتروني واتساب Copy Link
    السابقفي انتظار إنشاء الميليشيات!
    التالي السنوار على خطى صدام ومن معه يصفقون للخطيئة
    الاشتراك
    نبّهني عن
    guest
    guest
    0 تعليقات
    الأحدث
    الأقدم الأكثر تصويت
    Inline Feedbacks
    عرض جميع التعليقات
    RSS أحدث المقالات باللغة الإنجليزية
    • Local Spies with Lethal Gear: How Israel and Ukraine Reinvented Covert Action 12 ديسمبر 2025 The Wall Street Journal
    • Who Is Using the Hawala System in Lebanon — and Why It’s Growing 10 ديسمبر 2025 Samara Azzi
    • Lebanon ‘Draft Gap Law’: Either we lose together.. or we lose everything! 9 ديسمبر 2025 Jamil Naccache
    • A meeting of two logics as Holguin strives to clear the way to a 5+1 9 ديسمبر 2025 Yusuf Kanli
    • State Capture in the prism of the Lebanese petroleum cartel 7 ديسمبر 2025 Walid Sinno
    RSS أحدث المقالات بالفرنسية
    • Au cœur de Paris, l’opaque machine à cash de l’élite libanaise 5 ديسمبر 2025 Clément Fayol
    • En Turquie et au Liban, le pape Léon XIV inaugure son pontificat géopolitique 27 نوفمبر 2025 Jean-Marie Guénois
    • «En Syrie, il y a des meurtres et des kidnappings d’Alaouites tous les jours», alerte Fabrice Balanche 6 نوفمبر 2025 Celia Gruyere
    • Beyrouth, Bekaa, Sud-Liban : décapité par Israël il y a un an, le Hezbollah tente de se reconstituer dans une semi-clandestinité 20 أكتوبر 2025 Georges Malbrunot
    • L’écrasante responsabilité du Hamas dans la catastrophe palestinienne 18 أكتوبر 2025 Jean-Pierre Filiu
    23 ديسمبر 2011

    عائلة المهندس طارق الربعة: أين دولة القانون والموسسات؟

    8 مارس 2008

    رسالة مفتوحة لقداسة البابا شنوده الثالث

    19 يوليو 2023

    إشكاليات التقويم الهجري، وهل يجدي هذا التقويم أيُ نفع؟

    14 يناير 2011

    ماذا يحدث في ليبيا اليوم الجمعة؟

    3 فبراير 2011

    بيان الأقباط وحتمية التغيير ودعوة للتوقيع

    آخر التعليقات
    • Amine على ملخص كتاب “أيام محمد الأخيرة”، تأليف هالة وردي عام 2016
    • قارئ على (فيديو): هل “أعدم” الحزب الشيخ نبيل قاووق لأنه كان “متورطاً”؟
    • محمد سعيد على  العزل المالي والجنائي: استراتيجية واشنطن لتفكيك “شبكات الإخوان المسلمين” حول العالم
    • فاروق عيتاني على جبال متنقلة في صيدا
    • فاروق عيتاني على أحمد بيضون “في مهبّ النكبة اللبنانية”
    تبرع
    © 2025 Middle East Transparent

    اكتب كلمة البحث ثم اضغط على زر Enter

    loader

    Inscrivez-vous à la newsletter

    En vous inscrivant, vous acceptez nos conditions et notre politique de confidentialité.

    loader

    Subscribe to updates

    By signing up, you agree to our terms privacy policy agreement.

    loader

    اشترك في التحديثات

    بالتسجيل، فإنك توافق على شروطنا واتفاقية سياسة الخصوصية الخاصة بنا.

    wpDiscuz